Cited by 16Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Detection of Wolbachia in Dirofilaria infected dogs in Portugal

Landum, Miguel, Ferreira, Cátia C., Calado, Manuela, Alho, Ana M., Maurício, Isabel L., Meireles, José S., Carvalho, Luís Madeira de, Cunha, Celso +1 more·2014·Veterinary Parasitology

Abstract

Wolbachia pipiens, an intracellular endosymbiont bacteria of filarial nematodes, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of filarial diseases, in particular in heavy Dirofilaria spp. infections. Antibiotic therapy (doxycycline) against Wolbachia has been proven to be suitable adjunct therapy, prior to adulticide treatment of canine dirofilariosis. Despite its importance, investigation on the Wolbachia/Dirofilaria complex in Portugal had not been undertaken so far. This study reports the first detection of Wolbachia in Dirofilaria spp. infected dogs in the context of an ongoing epidemiological survey in central-south regions in the country. Wolbachia DNA was detected by PCR in 52.6% (20/38) of canine blood samples positive for Dirofilaria immitis based on parasitological (Knott's and Acid Phosphatase) and serological (Witness(®)Dirofilaria) methods. No Wolbachia DNA could be detected in samples from dogs with occult infections (parasite negative but antigen positive). The lack of Wolbachia detection in some microfilaremic dogs was somewhat unexpected and needs to be elucidated in further studies, as the presence or absence of these bacteria in association with microfilaria is of importance for veterinarians in the management and control of canine dirofilariosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.027

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In central coastal regions of Portugal, canine heartworm prevalence has been reported at 15.1%, while in the central region it ranged from 8.8 to 27.3%.

    “Other studies have reported prevalence of 15.1% in the central coastal regions of Portugal, while in the central region, prevalence ranged from 8.8 to 27.3% [12,13,14]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landum, M., Ferreira, C. C., Calado, M., Alho, A. M., Maurício, I. L., Meireles, J. S., Carvalho, L. M. D., Cunha, C., & Belo, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
  • Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar em Sanidade Animal (PT)
Corresponding author
Belo, Silvana
Venue
Veterinary Parasitology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
204
Issue
3-4
Pages
407-410
ISSN
0304-4017 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011785098
Cited by
16
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Veterinary Parasitology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PTDC/SAU-SAP/113523/2009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Wolbachia, Dirofilaria immitis, canine dirofilariasis, filarial nematodes, doxycycline treatment, microfilaremia, occult infection, Portugal
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Doxycycline, Female, Male, Microfilariae, Portugal, Wolbachia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review