Cited by 97Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesParasites and Host Interactions

Wolbachia filarial interactions: Wolbachia filarial cellular and molecular interactions

Open access
Taylor, Mark J., Voronin, Denis, Johnston, Kelly L., Ford, Louise·2013·Cellular Microbiology

Abstract

Wolbachia pipientis is a widespread intracellular bacterial symbiont of arthropods and is common in insects. One of their more exotic and unexpected hosts is the filarial nematodes, notable for the parasites responsible for onchocerciasis (river blindness), lymphatic filariasis (elephantiasis) and dirofilariasis (heartworm). Wolbachia are only present in a subgroup of the filarial nematodes and do not extend to other groups of nematodes either parasitic or free-living. In the medically and veterinary important species that host Wolbachia, the symbiont has become an essential partner to key biological processes in the life of the nematode to the point where antibiotic elimination of the bacteria leads to a potent and effective anti-filarial drug treatment. We review the cellular and molecular basis of Wolbachia filarial interactions and highlight the key processes provided by the endosymbiont upon which the nematodes have become entirely dependent. This dependency is primarily restricted to periods of the lifecycle with heavy metabolic demands including growth and development of larval stages and embryogenesis in the adult female. Also, the longevity of filarial parasites is compromised following depletion of the symbiont, which for the first time has delivered a safe and effective treatment to kill adult parasites with antibiotics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cmi.12084

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, M. J., Voronin, D., Johnston, K. L., & Ford, L.
Affiliations
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Mark J.
Venue
Cellular Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-24
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
520-526
ISSN
1462-5814 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1591278642
Cited by
97
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
Keywords
Wolbachia, filarial nematodes, endosymbiont-host interactions, onchocerciasis, lymphatic filariasis, dirofilariasis, Dirofilaria immitis, embryonic development, larval development, parasite longevity
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Filarioidea, Symbiosis, Survival Analysis, Wolbachia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review