Cited by 34HIV Research and TreatmentVirus-based gene therapy researchHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment

HIV 2-long terminal repeat circular DNA is stable in primary CD4+T Cells

Open access
Pace, Matthew J., Graf, Erin H., O'Doherty, Una·2013·Virology

Abstract

Treatment resistant latent reservoirs remain a barrier to cure HIV, but the maintenance and properties of these reservoirs are not completely understood. 2-LTR circular HIV DNA has been used to assess ongoing viral replication in HAART treated patients. However, the half-life of this DNA form is still debated with conflicting in vivo and in vitro data. Prior in vitro studies have focused on cell lines or short lived activated cells in cultures of brief duration, while in vivo studies have the added complications of cell migration, division, and death. Therefore, we monitored the stability of 2-LTR circles in primary CD4+T cells in a month long culture and compared it to the stability of integrated HIV DNA and T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), another circular DNA form that is thought to be stable. We found that 2-LTRs, along with TRECs, were stable, suggesting 2-LTRs do not necessarily indicate ongoing replication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.virol.2013.02.028

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The additional DNA fragments did not emerge via circular LTR integration because circular LTR viral genome configuration was absent in parental U1 cells and is short lived and intolerant to repeated passaging.

    “The additional fragments did not emerge via circular LTR integration, because it was absent in the parental U1 cells, and such circular LTR viral genome configuration occurs immediately after HIV-1 infection but is short lived and intolerant to repeated passaging”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pace, M. J., Graf, E. H., & O'Doherty, U.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Virology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
441
Issue
1
Pages
18-21
ISSN
0042-6822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023756765
Cited by
34
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Virology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R21A1087461)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI096993, R21AI087461)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Keywords
HIV reservoir, CD4+ T cells, integrated HIV DNA, TREC, HIV cure, primary T cells
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, DNA, Circular, DNA, Viral, Humans, Time Factors, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, HIV-2, HIV Long Terminal Repeat, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review