The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pyrolysis and physical separation for the recovery of spent LiFePO4 batteries
Abstract
In this study, a novel process consisting of pyrolysis and physical separation was proposed to comprehensively recycle spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs). The discharge and pyrolysis behaviors of spent LIBs, the recovery of electrolyte from the spent LIBs by low-temperature volatilization, and the recovery of valuable materials from the pyrolytic residues through physical separation were studied in detail. The results indicated that approximately 99.91% of the organic electrolytes was recycled, and the lithium salt (LiPF6) in the batteries was disposed by pyrolysis process. The active materials could be effectively separated from current collectors after the pyrolysis under N2 at 550 °C for 2 h. The pyrolytic gas was mainly composed of light alkenes, and the pyrolytic tar was mainly composed of aromatic long chain alkenes and light alcohols. Pyrolytic residues were recycled by color sorting, high-pressure water cleaning and flotation processes, and about 99.34% of Al, 96.25% of Cu, and 49.67% of cathode active materials were recovered from the spent LIBs. Finally, electrochemical tests indicate that the cathode active materials obtained by the process can be used to produce new batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A review of hazards associated with primary lithium and lithium-ion batteries
Lisbona, D., & Snee, T. (2011) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2011.06.022 · Cited by 701
Sun, L., & Qiu, K. (2011) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.114 · Cited by 493
Cited by
Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments
Armand, M., Axmann, P., Bresser, D., Copley, M., Edström, K., Ekberg, C., Guyomard, D., Lestriez, B., Novák, P., Petranikova, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228708 · Cited by 888
Neumann, J., Petranikova, M., Meeus, M., Gamarra, J. D., Younesi, R., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2022) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102917 · Cited by 805
Progresses in Sustainable Recycling Technology of Spent Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Du, K., Ang, E. H., Wu, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12271 · Cited by 458
Progress and Status of Hydrometallurgical and Direct Recycling of Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Larouche, F., Tedjar, F., Amouzegar, K., Houlachi, G., Bouchard, P., Demopoulos, G. P., & Zaghib, K. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13030801 · Cited by 417
A comprehensive review on the pretreatment process in lithium-ion battery recycling
Kim, S., Bang, J., Yoo, J., Shin, Y., Bae, J., Jeong, J., Kim, K., Dong, P., & Kwon, K. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126329 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhong, X., Liu, W., Han, J., Jiao, F., Qin, W., Liu, T., & Zhao, C.
- Venue
- Waste Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 0956-053X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2932634526
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyrolysis and physical separation for the recovery of spent LiFePO4 batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.068
- The paper
- Zhong, X., Liu, W., Han, J., Jiao, F., Qin, W., Liu, T., & Zhao, C. (2019). Pyrolysis and physical separation for the recovery of spent LiFePO4 batteries. Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.068
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.