Cited by 32Sustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Design and Development

Estimating the material stock in wooden residential houses in Finland

Open access
Nasiri, Bahareh, Piccardo, Chiara, Hughes, Mark·2021·Waste Management

Abstract

The aims of this study were to quantify the amount of wood in residential houses in Finland in 2017 that could be available for cascading, and to characterize the age distribution and gross floor area of the houses in the stock. Through a bottom-up material stock analysis, the mass of wood and the gross floor area of buildings in each building type and construction period were estimated. The study found that 10 million tons of wood are contained in the structures of residential houses built before 1969, equivalent to around 59% of the stock. Since much of this stock is nearing end of life, this material should soon become available for cascading so providing a significant potential resource. It was also found that, overall, the structural parts of residential houses embody 17.5 million tons of wood, of which around 9 million tons is, theoretically, reusable and recyclable. However, for effective reuse and recycling, further analysis of the quality, type and future availability of recovered wood is required. The current results could be used for material stock and flow analyses to help planning for the use of recovered wood. Further research is needed to fill in gaps in the time-series of the number and gross floor area of buildings constructed and their average gross floor area. Moreover, a material intensity analysis of Finnish buildings is needed to better quantify the wood used.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large amount of material waste is generated by the demolition sector, including timber that can be reused or recycled for structural purposes.

    “A large amount of material waste is generated by the demolition sector, including timber that can be reused or recycled for structural purposes [1 -4].”

    From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction reports that construction and demolition generate substantial waste, including wood, and says recovered wood may be reused or recycled depending on its quality. Section 3.4 identifies substantial wood stock in structural parts of houses, but the paper does not establish that recovered timber is suitable for structural use specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 32

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Augiseau, V., Barles, S., 2017. Studying construction materials flows and stock: a review. Resour., Conserv. Recycling 123, 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2016.09.002. · DOI
  2. Birat, J.-P., Daigo, I., Matsuno, Y., 2014. Methods to evaluate environmental aspects of materials. In: Treatise on Process Metallurgy. Elsevier, pp. 1459-1505. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096988-6.00035-3. · DOI
  3. Cristescu, C., Honfi, D., Sandberg, K., Sandin, Y., Shotton, E., Walsh, S., Cramer, M., Ridley-Ellis, D., Harte, A., Risse, M., Ivanica, R., De Arana-Fernández, M., García Barbero, M., Llana, D.F., Íñiguez-González, G., Nasiri, B., Hughes, M., Krof, Ž., 2020. Design for deconstruction and reuse of timber structures -state of the art review. https://doi.org/10.23699/bh1w-zn97. · DOI
  4. Deilmann, C., 2009. Urban Metabolism and the Surface of the City. In: Guiding Principles for Spatial Development in Germany. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1-16. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88839-0_7. · DOI
  5. Gálvez-Martos, José-Luis, Styles, David, Schoenberger, Harald, Zeschmar-Lahl, Barbara, 2018. Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resour., Conserv. Recycling 136, 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2018.04.016. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gontia, Paul, Nägeli, Claudio, Rosado, Leonardo, Kalmykova, Yuliya, Österbring, Magnus, 2018. Material-intensity database of residential buildings: a case-study of Sweden in the international context. Resour., Conserv. Recycling 130, 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.11.022. · DOI
  7. Han, Ji, Xiang, Wei-Ning, 2013. Analysis of material stock accumulation in China's infrastructure and its regional disparity. Sustainability Sci. 8 (4), 553-564. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0196-y. · DOI
  8. Höglmeier, Karin, Weber-Blaschke, Gabriele, Richter, Klaus, 2013. Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction -a case study for south- east Germany. Resour., Conserv. Recycling 78, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2013.07.004. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Huuhka, Satu, Lahdensivu, Jukka, 2016. Statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 44 (1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09613218.2014.980101. · DOI
  10. Jeskanen, T., 2000. From Corner-Timbered Log Wall to Light-Frame Structures: Finnish Wood Structures In The Early 1900s. Docomomo J. Kaasalainen, Tapio, Huuhka, Satu, 2016. Homogenous homes of Finland: standard flats in non-standardized blocks. Build. Res. Inf. 44 (3), 229-247. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09613218.2015.1055168. · DOI
  11. Kalcher, Jasmin, Praxmarer, Gabriel, Teischinger, Alfred, 2017. Quantification of future availabilities of recovered wood from Austrian residential buildings. Resour., Conserv. Recycling 123, 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. resconrec.2016.09.001. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kránitz, Katalin, Sonderegger, Walter, Bues, Claus-Thomas, Niemz, Peter, 2016. Effects of aging on wood: a literature review. Wood Sci. Technol. 50 (1), 7-22.
  13. Ortlepp, Regine, Gruhler, Karin, Schiller, Georg, 2018. Materials in Germany's domestic building stock: calculation model and uncertainties. Build. Res. Inf. 46 (2), 164-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1264121. · DOI
  14. Ortlepp, Regine, Gruhler, Karin, Schiller, Georg, 2016. Material stocks in Germany's non- domestic buildings: a new quantification method. Build. Res. Inf. 44 (8), 840-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1112096. · DOI
  15. Ruuska, Antti, Häkkinen, Tarja, 2014. Material efficiency of building construction. Buildings 4 (3), 266-294. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4030266. · DOI
  16. Sakaguchi, D., Takano, A., Hughes, M., 2016. The potential for cascading wood from demolished buildings: the condition of recovered wood through a case study in Finland. Int. Wood Prod. J. 7 (3), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 20426445.2016.1180495. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sandberg, Nina Holck, Sartori, Igor, Brattebø, Helge, 2014. Sensitivity analysis in long- term dynamic building stock modeling -Exploring the importance of uncertainty of input parameters in Norwegian segmented dwelling stock model. Energy Build. 85, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.09.028. · DOI
  18. Sartori, Igor, Sandberg, Nina Holck, Brattebø, Helge, 2016. Dynamic building stock modelling: General algorithm and exemplification for Norway. Energy Build. 132, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.098. · DOI
  19. Schiller, Georg, 2007. Urban infrastructure: challenges for resource efficiency in the building stock. Build. Res. & Inf. 35 (4), 399-411.
  20. Stephan, André, Athanassiadis, Aristide, 2018. Towards a more circular construction sector: Estimating and spatialising current and future non-structural material replacement flows to maintain urban building stocks. Resour., Conserv. Recycling 129, 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.022. · DOI
  21. Tanikawa, Hiroki, Hashimoto, Seiji, 2009. Urban stock over time: spatial material stock analysis using 4d-GIS. Build. Res. Inf. 37 (5-6), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09613210903169394. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Thelandersson, S., Aasheim, E., Ranta-Maunus, A., 2004. New timber construction in Nordic countries. Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Timber Engineering.
  23. Thonemann, Nils, Schumann, Matthias, 2018. Environmental impacts of wood-based products under consideration of cascade utilization: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 4181-4188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.069. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Villoria Sáez, Paola, Osmani, Mohamed, 2019. A diagnosis of construction and demolition waste generation and recovery practice in the European Union. J. Clean. Prod. 241, 118400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118400. · DOI
  25. Wiedenhofer, Dominik, Steinberger, Julia K., Eisenmenger, Nina, Haas, Willi, 2015. Maintenance and expansion: modeling material stocks and flows for residential buildings and transportation networks in the EU25. J. Indust. Ecol. 19 (4), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.2015.19.issue-410.1111/jiec.12216. · DOI

Authors
Nasiri, B., Piccardo, C., & Hughes, M.
Affiliations
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Linnaeus University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nasiri, Bahareh
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
135
Pages
318-326
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199567227
Cited by
32
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Tekniikan Edistamissaatio
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
material stocks, cascading, recovered wood, gross floor area, construction time, material intensity
MeSH terms
Finland, Housing, Wood, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review