Cited by 114

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification and visualisation of microplastics/ nanoplastics by Raman imaging (ii): Smaller than the diffraction limit of laser?

Fang, Cheng, Sobhani, Zahra, Zhang, Xian, Gibson, Christopher T., Tang, Youhong, Naidu, Ravi·2020·Water Research

Abstract

We recently reported (Sobhani et al., 2020) that when a confocal Raman microscope imaged a nanoplastic with the diameter of 100 nm, the imaging lateral size was 300-400 nm, due to the diffraction limit of the laser spot. In this study, we examine the lateral intensity distribution of the Raman signal emitted by nanoplastics (diameters ranging ∼30-600 nm) within the excitation laser spot. We find that the Raman emission intensity, similar to the excitation power density distributed within a laser spot, also follows a lateral Gaussian distribution. To image and visualise individual nanoplastics, we (i) decrease the mapping pixel size, in a hope to generate an image with high-resolution and simultaneously to pick up items from the "blind point". We can then either (ii) offset the colour to intentionally image only the high-intensity portion of the Raman signal (emitted from the centre of the laser spot), to localise the exact position of the nanoplastic; or (iii) categorise the imaged nanoplastics to different groups via their Raman intensity, to simultaneously and separately visualise large nanoplastics/strong Raman signals, medium nanoplastics and small nanoplastics, in an effort to avoid the shielding and overlooking of weak signals. We (iv) also cross-check multi-images simultaneously mapped at two or three characteristic peaks via either a logic-OR or a logic-AND algorithm. Thus the imaging uncertainty can be significantly reduced from a statistical point of view.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116046

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Adams, 2016, Review of near-field optics and superlenses for sub-diffraction-limited nano-imaging, AIP Adv., 6, 10.1063/1.4964498 · DOI
  2. Alimi, 2018, Microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments: aggregation, deposition, and enhanced contaminant transport, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 1704, 10.1021/acs.est.7b05559 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Domingos, 2009, Characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in the environment: multimethod determination of particle sizes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7277, 10.1021/es900249m · DOI
  4. Gigault, 2018, Current opinion: what is a nanoplastic?, Environ. Pollut., 235, 1030, 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.024 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hell, 2007, Far-field optical nanoscopy, Science, 316, 1153, 10.1126/science.1137395 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hernandez, 2019, Plastic teabags release billions of microparticles and nanoparticles into tea, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 12300, 10.1021/acs.est.9b02540 · DOI
  7. Holle, 2006, Optimizing UV laser focus profiles for improved MALDI performance, J. Mass Spectrom., 41, 705, 10.1002/jms.1041 · DOI
  8. Ivleva, 2017, Microplastic in aquatic ecosystems, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 56, 1720, 10.1002/anie.201606957 · DOI
  9. Kawata, 2017, Nano-Raman scattering microscopy: resolution and enhancement, Chem. Rev., 117, 4983, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00560 · DOI
  10. Koelmans, 2019, Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: critical review and assessment of data quality, Water Res., 155, 410, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kusch, 2018, Combined tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. C, 122, 16274, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03637 · DOI
  12. Lead, 2018, Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects-An updated review, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 37, 2029, 10.1002/etc.4147 · DOI
  13. Lenz, 2015, A critical assessment of visual identification of marine microplastic using Raman spectroscopy for analysis improvement, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 100, 82, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.09.026 · DOI
  14. Liu, 2007, Far-field optical hyperlens magnifying sub-diffraction-limited objects, Science, 315, 1686, 10.1126/science.1137368 · DOI
  15. Meyns, 2019, Library based identification and characterisation of polymers with nano-FTIR and IR-sSNOM imaging, Analytical Methods, 11, 5195, 10.1039/C9AY01193E · DOI
  16. Mitrano, 2019, Synthesis of metal-doped nanoplastics and their utility to investigate fate and behaviour in complex environmental systems, Nat. Nanotechnol., 14, 362, 10.1038/s41565-018-0360-3 · DOI
  17. Prats-Mateu, 2017, Tip in–light on: advantages, challenges, and applications of combining AFM and Raman microscopy on biological samples, Microsc. Res. Tech., 80, 30, 10.1002/jemt.22744 · DOI
  18. Rygula, 2018, Raman, AFM and SNOM high resolution imaging of carotene crystals in a model carrot cell system, Spectrochim. Acta Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc., 197, 47, 10.1016/j.saa.2018.01.054 · DOI
  19. Schwaferts, 2020, Nanoplastic analysis by online coupling of Raman microscopy and field-flow fractionation enabled by optical tweezers, Anal. Chem., 92, 5813, 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05336 · DOI
  20. Sherman, 1990, Growth and properties of LPCVD titanium nitride as a diffusion barrier for silicon device technology, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 1892, 10.1149/1.2086826 · DOI
  21. Silva, 2018, Microplastics in the environment: challenges in analytical chemistry - a review, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1017, 1, 10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.043 · DOI
  22. Sobhani, 2019, Identification and visualisation of microplastics by Raman mapping, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1077, 191, 10.1016/j.aca.2019.05.021 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Song, 2015, A comparison of microscopic and spectroscopic identification methods for analysis of microplastics in environmental samples, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 93, 202, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.01.015 · DOI
  24. Steidtner, 2008, Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and microscopy on single dye molecules with 15 nm resolution, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.236101 · DOI
  25. Taubner, 2006, Near-field microscopy through a SiC superlens, Science, 313, 1595, 10.1126/science.1131025 · DOI
  26. Vašková, 2011, A powerful tool for material identification: Raman spectroscopy, International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 5, 1205
  27. Zhang, 2017, Near-field Raman spectroscopy with aperture tips, Chem. Rev., 117, 5095, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00337 · DOI
  28. Zhang, 2008, Superlenses to overcome the diffraction limit, Nat. Mater., 7, 435, 10.1038/nmat2141 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2020, Rapid monitoring approach for microplastics using portable pyrolysis-mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 92, 4656, 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00300 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Metadata

Authors
Fang, C., Sobhani, Z., Zhang, X., Gibson, C. T., Tang, Y., & Naidu, R.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
183
Pages
116046
ISSN
0043-1354
Cited by
114
References
5
Language
en
Funders
  • University of Newcastle Australia
  • Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and visualisation of microplastics/ nanoplastics by Raman imaging (ii): Smaller than the diffraction limit of laser? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116046
The paper
Fang, C., Sobhani, Z., Zhang, X., Gibson, C. T., Tang, Y., & Naidu, R. (2020). Identification and visualisation of microplastics/ nanoplastics by Raman imaging (ii): Smaller than the diffraction limit of laser? Water Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116046