The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions
Open accessAbstract
This paper summarises the main findings concerning consumer behaviour for wine published in academic journals in the last ten years and provides some suggestions about strategic research directions to take in the next few years. One major finding was that few new or novel findings are occurring in some areas: the role of price, brand, region, grape variety, awards; comparisons of Old and New World; segmentation of wine consumers; the value of sustainable or ‘green’ wine practices to consumers. Another finding was the predominance of one-off convenience sample studies that are difficult to interpret for generalisable results. Some areas with greatest research needs are: retail marketing and consumer response to the variety of techniques retailers use; on-premise consumer behaviour; online and social media influences on consumers; premium and luxury wine behaviour and successful marketing practices; consumer behaviour in emerging markets; the value of wine tourism and marketing for value; the relationship between grape/wine quality and consumer behaviour; consumer response to wine and health issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait, J. D., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 4,595
Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions
Orth, U. R., & Malkewitz, K. (2008) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.72.3.064 · Cited by 705
Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices
Marley, A. A. J., & Louviere, J. J. (2005) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.05.003 · Cited by 661
Lockshin, L., Jarvis, W., d’Hauteville, F., & Perrouty, J.-P. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.009 · Cited by 530
Self-citationThe dimensions of wine quality
Charters, S., & Pettigrew, S. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.003 · Cited by 332
Wine consumers’ environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on willingness to purchase
Nelson Barber, N., Taylor, & Strick (2009) · International Journal of Wine Research · doi:10.2147/ijwr.s4649 · Cited by 329
Mueller, S., & Szolnoki, G. (2010) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.011 · Cited by 315
Forbes, S. L., Cohen, D. A., Cullen, R., Wratten, S. D., & Fountain, J. (2009) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.008 · Cited by 313
Fotopoulos, C., Krystallis, A., & Ness, M. (2003) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00130-1 · Cited by 256
Applying best‐worst scaling to wine marketing
Cohen, E. (2009) · International Journal of Wine Business Research · doi:10.1108/17511060910948008 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Schäufele, I., & Hamm, U. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118 · Cited by 426
Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers
Pomarici, E., & Vecchio, R. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.058 · Cited by 270
Alcser‐Isais, A. N., Smith, L. K., & Eastwick, P. W. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.2082 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Lockshin, L., & Corsi, A. M.
- Venue
- Wine Economics and Policy
- Publisher
- Firenze University Press
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-23
- ISSN
- 2212-9774 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986946785
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 62.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.wep.2012.11.003
- The paper
- Lockshin, L., & Corsi, A. M. (2012). Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2012.11.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
