The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers
Abstract
Abstract Although much has been written about sustainable food consumption in the last few decades, obtaining reliable information on consumer preferences for new social/ethical and eco-labeled products can be an arduous task. At the same time, there has been increased academic and professional interest in the wine consumption behavior and attitudes of so-called Millennials (individuals aged between 18 and 35). Indeed, this generation has grown up in a period where new wine attributes (i.e. beyond origin, price and brand) have gained great importance, specifically those concerning environmental, ethical and social issues associated with conventional production practices. Nevertheless, Millennial consumer preferences and purchase decisions of sustainable wines have not been truly investigated. Based on a survey of 500 Italian respondents, we assessed Millennial consumer interest and willingness to buy three wines with specific labels certifying environmental, social and ethical attributes, namely a carbon neutral wine, wine produced on land confiscated from a criminal organization, and wine that devolves money to African institutions that combat AIDS. Our findings reveal that the label related to social features (Libera Terra) obtains the highest patronage rate (almost 75% of respondents). Applying a probit model, estimates show that living in an urban area, being female and older (age cohort 27–35) significantly increases the probability of buying sustainable wines. The results are particularly useful for marketers and entrepreneurs since studies that compare different sustainability aspects of wine are particularly scant and no research has yet focused on Italian Millennials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management
Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 · Cited by 6,341
Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
CHISNALL, P. M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070237 · Cited by 3,435
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand
Grunert, K. G. (2005) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/eurrag/jbi011 · Cited by 1,719
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6 · Cited by 1,407
Social Desirability Bias in CATI, IVR, and Web Surveys: The Effects of Mode and Question Sensitivity
Kreuter, F., Presser, S., & Tourangeau, R. (2008) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfn063 · Cited by 1,220
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007 · Cited by 1,178
Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01175.x · Cited by 641
Social-desirability bias and the validity of self-reported values
Fisher, R. J., & Katz, J. E. (2000) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(200002)17:2<105::aid-mar3>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 544
Cited by
Schäufele, I., & Hamm, U. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118 · Cited by 426
Hoek, A. C., Pearson, D., James, S. W., Lawrence, M. A., & Friel, S. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.09.030 · Cited by 329
A Systematic Review of the Measurement of Sustainable Diets
Jones, A. D., Hoey, L., Blesh, J., Miller, L., Green, A., & Shapiro, L. F. (2016) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.115.011015 · Cited by 299
Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites
D'Amico, M., Di Vita, G., & Monaco, L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014 · Cited by 217
Coderoni, S., & Perito, M. A. (2021) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.018 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomarici, E., & Vecchio, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 537-545
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989207812
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 63.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.058
- The paper
- Pomarici, E., & Vecchio, R. (2014). Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.