The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness
Plassmann, H., O'Doherty, J., Shiv, B., & Rangel, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0706929105 · Cited by 1,122
Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics
Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208859 · Cited by 962
DELIZA, R., & MacFIE, H. J. H. (1996) · Journal of Sensory Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1745-459x.1996.tb00036.x · Cited by 763
Stefani, G., Romano, D., & Cavicchi, A. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.010 · Cited by 240
Cited by
Piqueras-Fiszman, B., & Spence, C. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.013 · Cited by 855
Szolnoki, G., & Hoffmann, D. (2013) · Wine Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001 · Cited by 419
Self-citationConsumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions
Lockshin, L., & Corsi, A. M. (2012) · Wine Economics and Policy · doi:10.1016/j.wep.2012.11.003 · Cited by 377
Exploring environmental consciousness and consumer preferences for organic wines without sulfites
D'Amico, M., Di Vita, G., & Monaco, L. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.014 · Cited by 217
Hoque, M. Z., Alam, M. N., & Nahid, K. A. (2018) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods7090150 · Cited by 112
“In food products, informed liking, such as consumers’ evaluation of packaging, brand, product variety, region, consumers’ blind liking, and so on, can mediate the relationship between cues and purchase intent [67].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, S., & Szolnoki, G.
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 774-783
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080468179
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 99.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.011
- The paper
- Mueller, S., & Szolnoki, G. (2010). The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Quality and Preference. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
