Cited by 60Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumHealth Education and Validation

Pregnant women's thoughts when assessing fear of birth on the Fear of Birth Scale

Ternström, Elin, Hildingsson, Ingegerd, Haines, Helen, Rubertsson, Christine·2016·Women and Birth

Abstract

Background Fear of childbirth is common during pregnancy but rarely assessed in clinical practice. The Fear of Birth Scale has been proposed as a valid measure suitable for assessing fear of birth in an antenatal clinical context. To make sure that the scale makes sense in relation to the known constructs of fear of birth, it is important to find out what women think when responding to the Fear of Birth Scale.Aim To report what women in mid-pregnancy think when assessing fear of birth on the Fear of Birth Scale.Methods A qualitative design using semi-structured interviews with a think aloud technique was used. Thirty-one women were recruited in gestational week 17-20. Content analysis was conducted to describe the different dimensions of fear of birth.Findings Worry was described as unspecific feelings and thoughts, often with a negative loading. Fear was described as a strong feeling connected to something specific. Furthermore, the women thought about aspects that influence their worries and fears and explained the strategies that helped them to cope with their fear of birth.Conclusion Women could clearly assess, describe, and discuss fear of birth using the Fear of Birth Scale. This supports the use of the Fear of Birth Scale in clinical settings as a starting point for further dialogue about women's fear of birth. The dialogue may identify women's need for information, treatment, and referral when necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.11.009

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ternström, E., Hildingsson, I., Haines, H., & Rubertsson, C.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Ternström, Elin
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
e44-e49
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2209988845
Cited by
60
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
fear of childbirth, pregnant women, antenatal assessment, think-aloud, worry, coping strategies, scale validity, second trimester, women's experiences
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Fear, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, Pregnant People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review