Cited by 101Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy-related medical research

Presence and process of fear of birth during pregnancy—Findings from a longitudinal cohort study

Hildingsson, Ingegerd, Haines, Helen, Karlström, Annika, Nystedt, Astrid·2017·Women and Birth

Abstract

Background The prevalence of fear of birth has been estimated between 8-30%, but there is considerable heterogeneity in research design, definitions, measurement tools used and populations. There are some inconclusive findings about the stability of childbirth fear.Aim to assess the prevalence and characteristics of women presenting with scores ≥60 on FOBS-The Fear of Birth Scale, in mid and late pregnancy, and to study change in fear of birth and associated factors.Methods A prospective longitudinal cohort study of a one-year cohort of 1212 pregnant women from a northern part of Sweden, recruited in mid pregnancy and followed up in late pregnancy. Fear of birth was assessed using FOBS-The fear of birth scale, with the cut off at ≥60.Findings The prevalence of fear of birth was 22% in mid pregnancy and 19% in late pregnancy, a statistically significant decrease. Different patterns were found where some women presented with increased fear and some with decreased fear. The women who experienced more fear or less fear later in pregnancy could not be differentiated by background factors.Conclusions More research is needed to explore factors important to reduce fear of childbirth and the optimal time to measure it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.02.003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hildingsson, I., Haines, H., Karlström, A., & Nystedt, A.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Mid Sweden University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hildingsson, Ingegerd
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
e242-e247
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2591751870
Cited by
101
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Research Council
  • Uppsala University
  • Mid Sweden University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
fear of childbirth, pregnancy, prevalence, second trimester, late pregnancy, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Fear, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Perinatal Care, Parturition, Delivery, Obstetric, Pregnant People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review