Cited by 17Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsDigital Mental Health Interventions

A randomized controlled study comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy and counselling by standard care for fear of birth – A study protocol

Ternström, Elin, Hildingsson, Ingegerd, Haines, Helen, Karlström, Annika, Sundin, Örjan, Ekdahl, Johanna, Segeblad, Birgitta, Larsson, Birgitta +2 more·2017·Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare

Abstract

Fear of birth is a concern that requires evidence based treatment. The aim of this study is to present the protocol of a randomized controlled multi-center trial to compare internet-based cognitive therapy with counseling as standard care for pregnant women reporting fear of birth. Participants will be recruited in mid-pregnancy. Women who score 60 or above on the Fear of Birth Scale will be offered to participate in this study. Data will be collected by questionnaires including validated instruments at baseline and follow-ups at gestational weeks 30 and 36, two months and one year after birth. The primary outcome will be level of fear of birth measured with the Fear of Birth Scale at 36 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcome measures are level of fear of birth at two months and one year after giving birth, preferences for mode of birth, requests for elective cesarean section, compliance and satisfaction with treatment and birth outcomes. A power calculation based on a 20% reduction of fear implies that approximately 200 will be included in the trial. The study outlined in this protocol will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing internet-based cognitive therapy with counseling for women reporting fear of birth. An effective treatment may result in better overall health for women with fear of birth and a reduction in cesarean sections for non-medical reasons. Evidence regarding treatment options of fear of birth will also provide a greater choice for women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.06.001

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ternström, E., Hildingsson, I., Haines, H., Karlström, A., Sundin, Ö., Ekdahl, J., Segeblad, B., Larsson, B., Rondung, E., & Rubertsson, C.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Mid Sweden University (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Ternström, Elin
Venue
Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
13
Pages
75-82
ISSN
1877-5756 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625169215
Cited by
17
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, counseling, pregnant women, fear of childbirth, elective cesarean section, medication adherence, treatment satisfaction, birth outcomes
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Counseling, Fear, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet, Parturition, Pregnant People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review