Cited by 219Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumCOVID-19 and Mental HealthCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Pregnant women voice their concerns and birth expectations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy

Open access
Ravaldi, Claudia, Wilson, Alyce, Ricca, Valdo, Homer, Caroline, Vannacci, Alfredo·2021·Women and Birth

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, COVID-19 was declared to be a pandemic. While data suggests that COVID-19 is not associated with significant adverse health outcomes for pregnant women and newborns, the psychological impact on pregnant women is likely to be high. AIM: The aim was to explore the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Italian pregnant women, especially regarding concerns and birth expectations. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of pregnant women in Italy was conducted. Responses were analysed for all women and segregated into two groups depending on previous experience of pregnancy loss. Analysis of open text responses examined expectations and concerns before and after the onset of the pandemic. FINDINGS: Two hundred pregnant women responded to the first wave of the survey. Most (n=157, 78.5%) had other children and 100 (50.0%) had a previous history of perinatal loss. 'Joy' was the most prevalent emotion expressed before COVID-19 (126, 63.0% before vs 34, 17.0% after; p<0.05); fear was the most prevalent after (15, 7.5% before vs 98, 49.0% after; p<0.05). Positive constructs were prevalent before COVID-19, while negative ones were dominant after (p<0.05). Across the country, women were concerned about COVID-19 and a history of psychological disorders was significantly associated with higher concerns (p<0.05). A previous pregnancy loss did not influence women's concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Women's expectations and concerns regarding childbirth changed significantly as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Women with a history of psychological disorders need particular attention as they seem to experience higher levels of concern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.002

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]World Health Organization WHO Recommendations. Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience 2018 30070803

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ravaldi, C., Wilson, A., Ricca, V., Homer, C., & Vannacci, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Burnet Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Vannacci, Alfredo
Venue
Women and Birth
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
335-343
ISSN
1871-5192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3041084622
Cited by
219
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 12
FWCI
34.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Women and Birth (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women, psychological impact, childbirth expectations, perinatal loss, maternal emotions, fear, Italy
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Anxiety, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fear, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Italy, Mental Health, Motivation, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Internet, Parturition, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review