Cited by 75Cognitive Abilities and TestingNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Developmental shifts in fMRI activations during visuospatial relational reasoning

Open access
Eslinger, Paul J., Blair, Clancy, Wang, JianLi, Lipovsky, Bryn, Realmuto, Jennifer, Baker, David, Thorne, Steven, Gamson, David +3 more·2009·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

To investigate maturational plasticity of fluid cognition systems, functional brain imaging was undertaken in healthy 8-19 year old participants while completing visuospatial relational reasoning problems similar to Raven's matrices and current elementary grade math textbooks. Analyses revealed that visuospatial relational reasoning across this developmental age range recruited activations in the superior parietal cortices most prominently, the dorsolateral prefrontal, occipital-temporal, and premotor/supplementary cortices, the basal ganglia, and insula. There were comparable activity volumes in left and right hemispheres for nearly all of these regions. Regression analyses indicated increasing activity predominantly in the superior parietal lobes with developmental age. In contrast, multiple anterior neural systems showed significantly less activity with age, including dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal, paracentral, and insula cortices bilaterally, basal ganglia, and particularly large clusters in the midline anterior cingulate/medial frontal cortex, left middle cingulate/supplementary motor cortex, left insula-putamen, and left caudate. Findings suggest that neuromaturational changes associated with visuospatial relational reasoning shift from a more widespread fronto-cingulate-striatal pattern in childhood to predominant parieto-frontal activation pattern in late adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.04.010

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On relatively simple relational reasoning tasks, younger children show increased prefrontal cortex activity relative to older children.

    “On relatively simple relational reasoning tasks, children at younger ages show increased levels of activity in PFC relative to children at older ages”

    From School Readiness and Self-Regulation: A Developmental Psychobiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as Eslinger et al. 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Burke HR (1985). Raven’s Progressive Matrices: More on norms, reliability, and validity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 231– 235.
  2. Fry-Hussey (1998). Age, processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. The Sciences and Engineering, 58 (9-B), 5151.
  3. Hartley AA & Speer NK (2000). Locating and fractioning working memory using functional neuroimaging: Storage, maintenance, and executive functions. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51, 45– 53. 11002352
  4. Liston C, Watts R, Tottenham N, Davidson M, Niogi S, Ulug A & Casey BJ (2006). Frontostriatal microstructure modulates cognitive control. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 553– 560. 16033925
  5. Ng VWK, Eslinger PJ, Williams SCR, (2000). Hemispheric preference in visuospatial processing: A complimentary approach with fMRI and lesion studies. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 80– 86. 10864232 PMC6871993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eslinger, P. J., Blair, C., Wang, J., Lipovsky, B., Realmuto, J., Baker, D., Thorne, S., Gamson, D., Zimmerman, E., Rohrer, L., & Yang, Q. X.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Eslinger, Paul J.
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981312687
Cited by
75
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (1-R01-EB00454-01A1, R01EB000454)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
cognitive development, fluid intelligence, superior parietal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, basal ganglia, insula, supplementary motor area, hemispheric lateralization, adolescence, childhood, Raven's Progressive Matrices, mathematical problem solving
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Problem Solving, Linear Models, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review