Cited by 9Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesDiabetes Management and Research

Glucose-Lowering Medication Use in CKD: Analysis of US Medicare Beneficiaries Between 2007 and 2016

Open access
Zhao, Julie Z., Weinhandl, Eric D., Carlson, Angeline M., St. Peter, Wendy L.·2021·Kidney Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the use of glucose-lowering medications in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is limited. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Medicare 5% random sample of patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes, 2007 to 2016. PREDICTORS: Study year, CKD stage, low-income subsidy status, and demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race/ethnicity). OUTCOMES: Trends in use of glucose-lowering medications. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Yearly cohorts of patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes were created. Descriptive statistics were used to report proportions of patients using glucose-lowering medications. To test overall trends in glucose-lowering medication classes, linear probability models with adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, CKD stage, and low-income subsidy status were used. RESULTS: Metformin use increased significantly from 32.7% in 2007 to 48.7% in 2016. Use of newer classes of glucose-lowering medications increased significantly, including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (5.6%, 2007; 21.7%, 2016), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (2.3%, 2007; 6.1%, 2016), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (0.2%, 2013; 3.3%, 2016). Newer insulin analogue use increased from 37.2% in 2007 to 46.3% in 2013 and then remained steady. Use of sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, older insulins (human regular and neutral protamine Hagedorn), α-glucosidase inhibitors, amylin mimetics, and meglitinides decreased significantly. Insulin was the most highly used single medication class. Insulin use was higher among low-income subsidy than among non-low-income subsidy patients. Combination therapy was less common as CKD stage increased. LIMITATIONS: Patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes and the CKD stages were identified with diagnosis codes and could not be verified through medical record review. Our results may not be generalizable to younger patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Use of metformin and newer glucose-lowering medication classes is increasing in patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes. We anticipate that percentages of patients with CKD using these newer agents will increase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.09.016

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large clinical trials have shown benefits of newer glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes.

    “Large clinical trials have shown benefits of newer glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with CKD with type 2 diabetes.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14”

    From Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that trials of empagliflozin and canagliflozin found cardiovascular and kidney benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes, and that a dulaglutide trial found kidney benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. It does not clearly report both cardiovascular and kidney benefits specifically in the CKD trial populations, so the claim’s population-specific wording is broader than the reported findings. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The clinical trials that may have impacted our results were CANVAS, EMPA-REG OUTCOME, SUSTAIN-6, and LEADER, all of which demonstrated significant cardiovascular and kidney benefits of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA.

    “The clinical trials that may have impacted our results were the CANVAS (canagliflozin, published 2017), EMPA-REG OUTCOME (empagliflozin, 2015), the Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-term Outcomes with Semaglutide in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6) trial (semaglutide, 2016), and the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEAD”

    From Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor or Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist Initiation Among Medicare-Insured Adults With CKD in the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports cardiovascular and kidney benefits from EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, and LEADER. It does not discuss SUSTAIN-6 trial outcomes or establish that these trials affected the citing authors’ results; its mention of semaglutide concerns FDA approval in 2019. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2019, FDA revises warnings regarding use of the diabetes medicine metformin in certain patients with reduced kidney function, FDA. February
  2. 2018, Chapter 2: Identification and care of patients with CKD. In: USRDS 2017 Annual Data Report, Am J Kidney Dis, 71, S31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J. Z., Weinhandl, E. D., Carlson, A. M., & St. Peter, W. L.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Julie Z.
Venue
Kidney Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
173-182.e1
ISSN
2590-0595 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116856823
Cited by
9
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kidney Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, glucose-lowering medications, metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, insulin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, combination therapy, low-income subsidy, Medicare beneficiaries, medication trends, CKD stage, insulin resistance, insulin sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review