CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CRISPR mediated somatic cell genome engineering in the chicken

Véron, Nadège, Qu, Zhengdong, Kipen, Phoebe A.S., Hirst, Claire E., Marcelle, Christophe·2015·Developmental Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.007

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Barrangou, 2014, Cas9 targeting and the CRISPR revolution, Science, 344, 707, 10.1126/science.1252964 · DOI
  2. Blair, 2003, Genetic mosaic techniques for studying Drosophila development, Development, 130, 5065, 10.1242/dev.00774 · DOI
  3. Canver, 2014, Characterization of genomic deletion efficiency mediated by clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 nuclease system in mammalian cells, J. Biol. Chem., 289, 21312, 10.1074/jbc.M114.564625 · DOI
  4. Das, 2006, A robust system for RNA interference in the chicken using a modified microRNA operon, Dev. Biol., 294, 554, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.02.020 · DOI
  5. Galli, 2008, Identification and characterization of subpopulations of Pax3 and Pax7 expressing cells in developing chick somites and limb buds, Dev. Dyn., 237, 1862, 10.1002/dvdy.21585 · DOI
  6. Gratz, 2014, Highly specific and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-catalyzed homology-directed repair in Drosophila, Genetics, 196, 961, 10.1534/genetics.113.160713 · DOI
  7. Gros, 2004, A two-step mechanism for myotome formation in chick, Dev. Cell, 6, 875, 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.006 · DOI
  8. Gros, 2009, WNT11 acts as a directional cue to organize the elongation of early muscle fibres, Nature, 457, 589, 10.1038/nature07564 · DOI
  9. Guo, 2014, Efficient RNA/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Xenopus tropicalis, Development, 141, 707, 10.1242/dev.099853 · DOI
  10. Hou, 2011, Conditional knockdown of target gene expression by tetracycline regulated transcription of double strand RNA, Dev., Growth Differ., 53, 69, 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01229.x · DOI
  11. Hruscha, 2013, Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing with low off-target effects in zebrafish, Development, 140, 4982, 10.1242/dev.099085 · DOI
  12. Hsu, 2014, Development and applications of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome engineering, Cell, 157, 1262, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Irion, 2014, Precise and efficient genome editing in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Development, 141, 4827, 10.1242/dev.115584 · DOI
  14. Itasaki, 1999, ‘Shocking’ developments in chick embryology: electroporation and in ovo gene expression, Nat. Cell Biol., 1, E203, 10.1038/70231 · DOI
  15. Jinek, 2012, A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science, 337, 816, 10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Jostes, 1990, The murine paired box gene, Pax7, is expressed specifically during the development of the nervous and muscular system, Chick Dev. Biol., 33, 27
  17. Mali, 2013, RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9, Science, 339, 823, 10.1126/science.1232033 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marcelle, 1995, The in vivo expression of the FGF receptor FREK mRNA in avian myoblasts suggests a role in muscle growth and differentiation, Dev. Biol., 172, 100, 10.1006/dbio.1995.0008 · DOI
  19. Miller, 2011, A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 143, 10.1038/nbt.1755 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Nakamura, 2013, Electroporation: past, present and future, Dev. Growth Differ., 55, 15, 10.1111/dgd.12012 · DOI
  21. Norris, 2014, Morpholinos: studying gene function in the chick, Dev. Biol., 66, 454
  22. Park, 2014, Targeted gene knockout in chickens mediated by TALENs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 12716, 10.1073/pnas.1410555111 · DOI
  23. Peng, 2014, Making designer mutants in model organisms, Development, 141, 4042, 10.1242/dev.102186 · DOI
  24. Pennisi, 2013, The CRISPR craze, Science, 341, 833, 10.1126/science.341.6148.833 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Porteus, 2005, Gene targeting using zinc finger nucleases, Nat. Biotechnol., 23, 967, 10.1038/nbt1125 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Ran, 2013, Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity, Cell, 154, 1380, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.021 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Rios, 2011, Neural crest regulates myogenesis through the transient activation of NOTCH, Nature, 473, 532, 10.1038/nature09970 · DOI
  28. Sato, 2007, Stable integration and conditional expression of electroporated transgenes in chicken embryos, Dev. Biol., 305, 616, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.01.043 · DOI
  29. Sánchez-Rivera, 2014, Rapid modelling of cooperating genetic events in cancer through somatic genome editing, Nature, 516, 428, 10.1038/nature13906 · DOI
  30. Scaal, 2004, In ovo electroporation of avian somites, Dev. Dyn., 229, 643, 10.1002/dvdy.10433 · DOI
  31. Schindelin, 2012, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat Meth, 9, 676, 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Serralbo, 2014, Migrating cells mediate long-range WNT signaling, Development, 141, 2057, 10.1242/dev.107656 · DOI
  33. Serralbo, 2013, Long term, inducible gene loss-of-function in the chicken embryo, Genesis, 10.1002/dvg.22388 · DOI
  34. Shen, 2014, Efficient genome modification by CRISPR–Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects, Nat. Methods, 11, 399, 10.1038/nmeth.2857 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Sieiro-Mosti, 2014, A dynamic analysis of muscle fusion in the chick embryo, Development, 141, 3605, 10.1242/dev.114546 · DOI
  36. Voiculescu, 2008, Spatially and temporally controlled electroporation of early chick embryos, Nat. Protocols, 3, 419, 10.1038/nprot.2008.10 · DOI
  37. Wang, 2014, A gene regulatory network controls the binary fate decision of rod and bipolar cells in the vertebrate retina, Dev. Cell, 30, 513, 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.07.018 · DOI
  38. Xue, 2014, CRISPR-mediated direct mutation of cancer genes in the mouse liver, Nature, 514, 380, 10.1038/nature13589 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Yin, 2014, Genome editing with Cas9 in adult mice corrects a disease mutation and phenotype, Nat. Biotechnol.
  40. Yokota, 2011, Genomically integrated transgenes are stably and conditionally expressed in neural crest cell-specific lineages, Dev. Biol., 353, 382, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.001 · DOI
  41. Zhou, 2014, Dual sgRNAs facilitate CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mouse genome targeting, FEBS J., 281, 1717, 10.1111/febs.12735 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Véron, N., Qu, Z., Kipen, P. A. S., Hirst, C. E., & Marcelle, C.
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
407
Issue
1
Pages
68-74
ISSN
0012-1606
DOI
10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.007
Cited by
71
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, Australia) (APP1034736, APP1065954)
  • Australian Research Council (ARC) (DP130103680)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review