Cited by 769

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient genome modification by CRISPR-Cas9 nickase with minimal off-target effects

Shen, Bin, Zhang, Wensheng, Zhang, Jun, Zhou, Jiankui, Wang, Jianying, Chen, Li, Wang, Lu, Hodgkins, Alex, Iyer, Vivek, Huang, Xingxu, Skarnes, William C·2014·Nature Methods

Abstract

Bacterial RNA-directed Cas9 endonuclease is a versatile tool for site-specific genome modification in eukaryotes. Co-microinjection of mouse embryos with Cas9 mRNA and single guide RNAs induces on-target and off-target mutations that are transmissible to offspring. However, Cas9 nickase can be used to efficiently mutate genes without detectable damage at known off-target sites. This method is applicable for genome editing of any model organism and minimizes confounding problems of off-target mutations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nmeth.2857

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Urnov, F.D., Rebar, E.J., Holmes, M.C., Zhang, H.S. & Gregory, P.D. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 636–646 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cho, S.W., Kim, S., Kim, J.M. & Kim, J.S. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 230–232 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Shen, B. et al. Cell Res. 23, 720–723 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Yang, H. et al. Cell 154, 1370–1379 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Wang, J. et al. Genome Res. 22, 1316–1326 (2012). · DOI
  6. Kim, E. et al. Genome Res. 22, 1327–1333 (2012). · DOI
  7. Ran, F.A. et al. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Yeh, S. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13498–13503 (2002). · DOI
  9. Tesson, L. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 695–696 (2011). · DOI
  10. Caldecott, K.W. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 619–631 (2008). · DOI
  11. Rogakou, E.P., Boon, C., Redon, C. & Bonner, W.M. J. Cell Biol. 146, 905–916 (1999). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shen, B., Zhang, W., Zhang, J., Zhou, J., Wang, J., Chen, L., Wang, L., Hodgkins, A., Iyer, V., Huang, X., & Skarnes, W. C.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2014-03-02
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
399-402
ISSN
  • 1548-7091
  • 1548-7105
Cited by
769
References
15
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review