Cited by 65Epilepsy research and treatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Psychosocial treatment programs in epilepsy: a review

Mittan, Robert James·2009·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Psychosocial problems are a major unmet treatment need in epilepsy. The purpose of this review was to describe published psychosocial treatment interventions in the English medical literature. Seventeen outcome studies for 15 treatments were found. Survival past proof of concept was a problem, with only four programs making it into current use. With important exceptions, treatments met with limited success. Several were successful with medical education, improving quality of life, social adjustment, and adjustment to seizures. A psychological intervention for seizure control for patients with refractory epilepsy was outstanding. Research problems included few control groups, a dependence on paper-and-pencil measures, limited variables, and only one study with serum determination for compliance. Low cost-effectiveness was a problem. Only one approach showed economic promise. Low participation by patients was an unexpected barrier. Psychosocial treatments should be targeted for development and needs to be integrated into the treatment flow of specialty clinics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.08.031

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of psychological treatments for epilepsy, making it easy for healthcare purchasers to ignore guideline references to such treatments.

    “To date it has been relatively easy for healthcare purchasers to ignore references to the provision of psychological treatments in epilepsy treatment guidelines because there is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions [9, 10].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mittan, R. J.
Corresponding author
Mittan, Robert James
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
371-380
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053669888
Cited by
65
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
epilepsy, psychosocial interventions, psychological intervention, drug-resistant epilepsy, seizure control, quality of life, social adaptation, medical education, medication adherence, cost-effectiveness, patient participation
MeSH terms
Epilepsy, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychological Techniques, Self Concept, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review