Cited by 302DNA Repair MechanismsPARP inhibition in cancer therapyEffects of Radiation Exposure

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases in double-strand break repair: Focus on PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3

Beck, Carole, Robert, Isabelle, Reina-San-Martin, Bernardo, Schreiber, Valérie, Dantzer, Françoise·2014·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) is a post-translational modification of proteins catalysed by Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARP). A wealth of recent advances in the biochemical and functional characterization of the DNA-dependent PARP family members have highlighted their key contribution in the DNA damage response network, the best characterized being the role of PARP1 and PARP2 in the resolution of single-strand breaks as part of the BER/SSBR process. How PARylation contributes to the repair of double-strand breaks is less well defined but has become recently the subject of significant research in the field. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge concerning the role of the DNA-activated PARP1, PARP2 and PARP3 in cellular response to double-strand breaks (DSB). In addition, we outline the biological significance of these properties in response to programmed DNA lesions formed during physiological processes such as antibody repertoire assembly and diversification.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.07.003

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PARP1 alone is responsible for about 90% of total PARP activity at least in response to DNA damage.

    “PARP1 is the best-characterized member of the group, and it alone is responsible for about 90% of total PARP activity at least in response to DNA damage28,29.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, C., Robert, I., Reina-San-Martin, B., Schreiber, V., & Dantzer, F.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Dantzer, Françoise
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
329
Issue
1
Pages
18-25
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970435786
Cited by
302
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Electricité de France
  • Ligue Contre le Cancer
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
Keywords
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, PARP1, PARP2, PARP3, poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, DNA double-strand break repair, DNA damage response, single-strand break repair, base excision repair, post-translational modification, somatic hypermutation, V(D)J recombination
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review