Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current understanding of the mechanism of HPV infection

Open access
Schiller, John T., Day, Patricia M., Kines, Rhonda C.·2010·Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract

HPVs (human papillomaviruses) and other papillomaviruses have a unique mechanism of infection that has likely evolved to limit infection to the basal cells of stratified epithelium, the only tissue in which they replicate. Recent studies in a mouse cervicovaginal challenge model indicate that, surprisingly, the virus cannot initially bind to keratinocytes in vivo. Rather it must first bind via its L1 major capsid protein to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on segments of the basement membrane (BM) exposed after epithelial trauma and undergo a conformational change that exposes the N-terminus of L2 minor capsid protein to furin cleavage. L2 proteolysis exposes a previously occluded surface of L1 that binds an as yet undetermined cell surface receptor on keratinocytes that have migrated over the BM to close the wound. Papillomaviruses are the only viruses that are known to initiate their infectious process at an extracellular site. In contrast to the in vivo situation, the virions can bind directly to many cultured cell lines through cell surface HSPGs and then undergo a similar conformational change and L2 cleavage. Transfer to the secondary receptor leads to internalization, uncoating in late endosomes, escape from the endosome by an L2-dependent mechanism, and eventual trafficking of an L2–genome complex to specific subnuclear domains designated ND10 bodies, where viral gene transcription is initiated. The infectious process is remarkably slow and asynchronous both in vivo and in cultured cells, taking 12–24 h for initiation of transcription. The extended exposure of antibody neutralizing determinants while the virions reside on the BM and cell surfaces might, in part, account for the remarkable effectiveness of vaccines based on neutralizing antibodies to L1 virus-like particles or the domain of L2 exposed after furin cleavage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.004

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Schiller, J. T., Day, P. M., & Kines, R. C.
Venue
Gynecologic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
118
Issue
1
Pages
S12-S17
ISSN
0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136503446
Cited by
332
References
52
FWCI
19.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current understanding of the mechanism of HPV infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.004
The paper
Schiller, J. T., Day, P. M., & Kines, R. C. (2010). Current understanding of the mechanism of HPV infection. Gynecologic Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.04.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.