Cited by 43Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseCrime Patterns and Interventions

Risk factors for assaultive reinjury and death following a nonfatal firearm assault injury: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Pear, Veronica A., McCort, Christopher D., Kravitz-Wirtz, Nicole, Shev, Aaron B., Rowhani-Rahbar, Ali, Wintemute, Garen J.·2020·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Individuals with a firearm injury are at high risk of subsequent firearm victimization, but characteristics associated with sustaining recurrent firearm injuries are not well understood. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought to quantify the hazards of sustaining subsequent assaultive firearm injuries among people with an initial firearm assault injury and to identify characteristics associated with recurrent victimization. Using hospital discharge, emergency department, and mortality records, we identified and followed all individuals aged ≥15 years with a nonfatal firearm assault injury resulting in an emergency department visit or hospital admission in California, 2005-2013. We model transitions from one injury to the next and from injury to death, accounting for event history, covariates, and competing risks using multistate models. 29,156 people had an index nonfatal firearm assault injury. Among individuals with 1 such injury, 3.1% had additional nonfatal firearm assault injuries and 1.0% subsequently died from firearm homicide. Among individuals with 2+ nonfatal firearm assaults, 2.0% died from firearm homicide. The estimated transition probability for 1 to 2+ nonfatal injuries reached 10% by 8.5 years post-index injury. The rate of subsequent nonfatal firearm assault injury was highest among men (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.63-5.69) and Blacks (vs. whites) (HR: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.99-3.64). Identification of additional risk markers will…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106198

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pear, V. A., McCort, C. D., Kravitz-Wirtz, N., Shev, A. B., Rowhani-Rahbar, A., & Wintemute, G. J.
Affiliations
University of California System (US)
Corresponding author
Pear, Veronica A.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
139
Pages
106198
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3040803118
Cited by
42
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 23 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Heising-Simons Foundation
  • California Wellness Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
injury recurrence, firearm homicide, multi-state models, competing risks, uninsured status, racial disparities, sex differences, California
MeSH terms
Reinjuries, Firearms, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Wounds, Gunshot, Cohort Studies, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review