Cited by 23Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchGene expression and cancer classificationAgricultural safety and regulations

Gene expression profiling for food safety assessment: Examples in potato and maize

Open access
Dijk, Jeroen P. van, Leifert, Carlo, Barros, Eugenia, Kok, Esther J.·2010·Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Abstract

Since the mid 1990s, microarray analysis has become one of the few tools that can analyze the entire contents of a cell regarding a specific information type. Especially since the development of whole genome microarrays the technique can be considered truly holistic. Most DNA based microarrays are used for the analysis of the total of messenger RNAs (transcriptome) and provide a snap-shot of what's going on in a cell population at the time of sampling. Within the last few years also full genome plant microarrays have become available for several crop species. With these it has been shown that several growing conditions can be separated based on their transcriptome pattern, such as location, year of harvest and agricultural input system, but also different cultivars of the same crop species, including genetically modified ones. A database comprising expression levels of the transcriptome in many different circumstances with a history of safe use would be a good comparator for evaluation of new agricultural practices or cultivars, genetically modified or otherwise obtained. New techniques as next generation sequencing may overcome issues on throughput time and cost, standard operation procedures and array design for individual crops.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.012

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dijk, J. P. V., Leifert, C., Barros, E., & Kok, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
Corresponding author
Dijk, Jeroen P. van
Venue
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
S21-S25
ISSN
0273-2300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136235580
Cited by
23
References
20
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
gene expression profiling, food safety assessment, transcriptome, microarray data analysis, potato, maize, genetically modified crops, cultivar comparison, growth conditions, next-generation sequencing
MeSH terms
Zea mays, Solanum tuberosum, Databases, Factual, Genes, Plant, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Crops, Agricultural, Genome, Plant, Gene Expression Profiling, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food, Genetically Modified, Microarray Analysis, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review