Cited by 137Probiotics and Fermented FoodsAgricultural safety and regulationsComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Considerations for determining safety of probiotics: A USP perspective

Open access
Roe, Amy L., Boyte, Marie-Eve, Elkins, Chris A., Goldman, Virginia S., Heimbach, James, Madden, Emily, Oketch-Rabah, Hellen, Sanders, Mary Ellen, Sirois, Jay, Smith, Amy·2022·Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Abstract

A history of safe use is a backbone of safety assessments for many current probiotic species, however, there is no global harmonization regarding requirements for establishing probiotic safety for use in foods and supplements. As probiotic manufacturers are increasingly seeking to use new strains, novel species, and next-generation probiotics, justification based on a significant history of use may be challenged. There are efforts underway by a variety of stakeholders, including the United States Pharmacopeia (USP), to develop best practices guidelines for assessing the quality and safety of probiotics. A current initiative of the USP seeks to provide expert advice specific to safety considerations for probiotics. Toward this goal, this review provides a helpful summary guide to global regulatory guidelines. We question the suitability of traditional animal toxicology studies designed for testing chemicals for relevance in assessing probiotic safety. This includes discussion of the use of excessive dose levels, the length of repeated dose toxicity studies needed, and the most suitable animal species used in toxicology studies. In addition, the importance of proper manufacturing practices with regard to final product safety are also included. Thus, an outline of essential parameters of a comprehensive safety assessment for a probiotic are provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105266

Cites

92 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Phenotypic and Genotypic analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes for consideration of strain safety.
Fig. 1. Phenotypic and Genotypic analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes for consideration of strain safety.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. A proposed testing tier to guide data needs and studies for assessing probiotic safety.
Fig. 2. A proposed testing tier to guide data needs and studies for assessing probiotic safety.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lahtinen, 2009, Safety assessment of probiotics, chapter 31, 1page 1193
  2. Smith, 2019, Chapter 40: the regulation of probiotics in the United States
  3. Regulation (EC), 2004, No 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004: laying down specific hygiene rules for the hygiene of foodstuffs, J. Eur. Union

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Roe, A. L., Boyte, M.-E., Elkins, C. A., Goldman, V. S., Heimbach, J., Madden, E., Oketch-Rabah, H., Sanders, M. E., Sirois, J., & Smith, A.
Affiliations
  • Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
  • United States Pharmacopeial Convention (US)
  • Consumer Healthcare Products Association (US)
Corresponding author
Roe, Amy L.
Venue
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
136
Pages
105266
ISSN
0273-2300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4300981179
Cited by
136
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic safety assessment, regulatory guidelines, United States Pharmacopoeia, veterinary toxicology, repeated-dose toxicity, dose levels, animal species selection, manufacturing practices, international harmonization
MeSH terms
Animals, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review