Cited by 92Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Food Waste is Reduced when Elementary-School Children Have Recess before Lunch

GETLINGER, MARY JANE, LAUGHLIN, CAROL V.T, BELL, ELIZABETH, AKRE, CHRISTINE, ARJMANDI, BAHRAM H·1996·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00245-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having lunch before recess may decrease the amount of food students eat and the nutrients they need to function and learn throughout the school day.

    “environmental or system-related factors, such as having lunch before recess may decrease the amount of food students are eating as well as the nutrients they need to function and learn throughout the school day (Bergman, Buergel, Englund, and Femrite, 2003;Getlinger, Laughlin, Bell, Akre, & Arjmandi, 1996;Ruppenthal & Hogue, 1977).”

    From Modifying the Recess Before Lunch Program (2005) · cites this paper as Getlinger, Laughlin, Bell, Akre, & Arjmandi, 1996

  • Recess before lunch revealed positive benefits such as reduced plate waste, increased food and milk consumption, and improvement in overall lunchtime environment, student behavior, and classroom concentration.

    “This variation in scheduling is of importance because recess before lunch revealed positive benefits such as reduced plate waste, increased food and milk consumption as well as an improvement in overall lunchtime environment, student behavior, and classroom concentration [6, 7, 8].”
  • Other studies have found changes in food consumption.

    “While others have found changes in food consumption, we did not find a significant difference [13,14,27].”
  • The majority of children in the USA fail to meet national guidelines for fruit consumption by considerable margins.

    “The majority of children in the USA fail to meet national guidelines for fruit consumption by considerable margins (57,59) .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GETLINGER, M. J., LAUGHLIN, C. V. T., BELL, E., AKRE, C., & ARJMANDI, B. H.
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Agriculture (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-09
Volume
96
Issue
9
Pages
906-908
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980985505
Cited by
92
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
food waste, elementary school students, recess, school meals, child nutrition, meal timing
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Services, Humans, Male, Time Factors, United States, Exercise, United States Department of Agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review