Cited by 11Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Prevalence of Evidence-Based School Meal Practices and Associations with Reported Food Waste across a National Sample of U.S. Elementary Schools

Open access
Calvert, Hannah G., Ohri-Vachaspati, Punam, McQuilkin, Michaela, Boedeker, Peter, Turner, Lindsey·2021·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Providing meals at school is an important part of the hunger safety net for children in the United States and worldwide; however, many children do not receive school meals even when they qualify for federally-subsidized free or reduced-priced meals. This study investigates the prevalence of several evidence-based practices that have previously been shown to increase the reach and impact of school meals. A survey was sent to a national sample of US elementary schools, with items examining practices regarding school breakfast, school lunch, recess, the promotion of meals, nutrition standards, and food waste, during the 2019–20 school year. Almost all schools that offered lunch also offered breakfast. More than 50% used a breakfast service strategy other than cafeteria service, such as grab-and-go breakfast meals. Providing at least 30 min for lunch periods and providing recess before lunch were reported by less than half of schools. About 50% of schools reported using only one or fewer meal promotional strategies (such as taste tests) throughout the school year. Use of more promotional strategies was associated with less reported food waste in a multivariable regression model accounting for school demographic characteristics. Findings show that some evidence-based practices for school meals are being implemented, but many recommendations are not being widely adopted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph18168558

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less than half of schools in the U.S. reported a minimum of 30 min of scheduled lunch.

    “less than half of schools in the U.S. reported a minimum of 30 min of scheduled lunch [21]”

    From When to Eat and When to Play: Variations in Recess and Lunch Scheduling Within a State 40‐Min Recess Policy (2025) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Discussion reports that 61% of respondents said their school’s third-grade lunch period lasted less than 30 minutes, supporting the ‘less than half’ figure. But the study surveyed U.S. elementary schools and asked specifically about third-grade lunch; the claim broadens this to U.S. schools generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A 30-min scheduled lunch period is recommended to achieve 20 min of seat time.

    “A 30‐min scheduled lunch period is recommended to achieve 20 min of seat time, and less than half of schools in the U.S. reported a minimum of 30 min of scheduled lunch [21].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [51]Ralston: A Healthy School Meal Environment: Food Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=A%20Healthy%20School%20Meal%20Environment%3A%20Food%20Assistance%20Research%20Brief&author=KL%20Ralston&publication_year=2003 (accessed on 22 March 2021)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvert, H. G., Ohri-Vachaspati, P., McQuilkin, M., Boedeker, P., & Turner, L.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
Corresponding author
Turner, Lindsey
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-08-13
Volume
18
Issue
16
Pages
8558
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3195335362
Cited by
8
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Works (Boise State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (HER 76291)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
school meals, food waste, evidence-based practice, elementary school, school breakfast, recess, nutritional standards, free and reduced-price meals, child hunger
MeSH terms
Child, Food Services, Humans, Refuse Disposal, Schools, United States, Prevalence, Meals, Lunch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review