Cited by 29Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Assessment of interchangeability of two brands of levothyroxine preparations with a third-generation TSH assay

Escalante, David A., Arem, Noura, Arem, Ridha·1995·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate, in a prospective fashion, the clinical interchangeability between two brands of levothyroxine, Synthroid (Boots Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lincolnshire, Illinois) and Levoxine (Daniels Pharmaceuticals, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida), by using clinical scores of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, free thyroxine index (FTI), sensitive thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation testing.Patients and methods Twenty-three of the 31 patients with long-standing primary hypothyroidism (6 men, 25 women; age range 30 to 71 years, mean 47.2 +/- 2.2 SEM) were switched from Synthroid to Levoxine (group 1) and the remaining patients from Levoxine to Synthroid (group 2). After switching, each patient continued to receive the same dosage as previously. Clinical scores of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism (Billewicz and Crooks scoring systems, respectively), basal FTI, and TRH stimulation test were obtained before and 4 months after the switching. Comparison of the variables before and after switching was performed separately in each subgroup and in the entire group.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the hypothyroid clinical scores (-40.1 +/- 1.2 versus -39.7 +/- 1.2), the hyperthyroid clinical scores (-19.6 +/- 0.9 versus -19.2 +/- 1.0), FTI (9.6 +/- 0.3 versus 9.6 +/- 0.3), basal TSH levels (1.4 +/- 0.2 versus 1.4 +/- 0.2 mIU/L), or the magnitude of TSH response to TRH (mean delta TSH 9.4 +/- 1.5 versus 9.2 +/- 1.4 mIU/L), whether the patients were receiving Synthroid or Levoxine.Conclusions Switching did not result in substantial clinical or laboratory changes in any individual patient. We conclude that the two brands of levothyroxine are clinically interchangeable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80316-7

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escalante, D. A., Arem, N., & Arem, R.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Arem, Ridha
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-04
Volume
98
Issue
4
Pages
374-378
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110287465
Cited by
29
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
levothyroxine, drug interchangeability, brand switching, primary hypothyroidism, free thyroxine index, thyroid-stimulating hormone, TRH stimulation test
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Male, Middle Aged, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review