Cited by 23Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyThyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Impact of a forced dose-equivalent levothyroxine brand switch on plasma thyrotropin: a cohort study.

Open access
Flinterman, Linda E., Kuiper, Josephina G., Korevaar, Joke C., van Dijk, Liset, Hek, Karin, Houben, Eline, Herings, Ron, Franken, Anton A.M. +10 more·2020·Thyroid

Abstract

Background: Patients with primary hypothyroidism are treated with levothyroxine (LT4) to normalize their serum thyrotropin (TSH). Finding the optimal dosage is a long-lasting process, and a small change can have major impact. Currently, limited data are available on the impact of dose-equivalent substitution between brands. This study aimed to determine the effect of the shortage of the LT4 brand Thyrax ® in the Netherlands and the resulting dose-equivalent switch to another brand on plasma TSH concentrations in a large cohort of patients. Methods: Observational cohort study. Two registries representative for the Dutch population containing prescription and laboratory test data: the Nivel Primary Care Database and the PHARMO Database Network. Patients using at least 25 μg Thyrax daily for one year or longer were included. Two cohorts were formed: a switch cohort consisting of patients who switched from Thyrax to an alternative brand, and a Thyrax cohort including patients who continued to use Thyrax. Patients in the switch cohort did switch from Thyrax to a different brand of LT4 in 2016 and had two consecutive TSH measurements on the same dose of LT4, one before and one 6 weeks after the switch. Patients in the Thyrax cohort had two consecutive TSH measurements on the same dose of Thyrax that were 6 weeks apart. Results: In the Thyrax cohort, 19% of euthyroid patients using ≤100 μg had a TSH level outside the reference range at the subsequent measurement compared with 24% in the switch cohort ( p < 0.0001). For patients using >100 μg Thyrax, these figures were 24% and 63%, respectively ( p < 0.0001). Furthermore, patients using >50 μg Thyrax were four to five times more likely to become hyperthyroid after a dose-equivalent switch to a different brand compared with patients who stayed on Thyrax. Conclusions: In euthyroid patients continuing the LT4 product Thyrax at the same dose, TSH was out of range in 19–24% at least 6 weeks later. A dose-equivalent switch from Thyrax to other LT4 brands induced biochemical signs of overdosing in an even larger proportion (24–63%) of patients. The results indicate that a dose-equivalent LT4 brand switch may necessitate a dose adjustment in a large number of patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/thy.2019.0414

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flinterman, L. E., Kuiper, J. G., Korevaar, J. C., van Dijk, L., Hek, K., Houben, E., Herings, R., Franken, A. A. M., de Graaf, J. P., Horikx, A., Janssens, M., Meijer, R., Wijbenga, A., van Puijenbroek, E., Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R., Links, T. P., Bisschop, P. H., & Fliers, E.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
  • Pharmo Institute (NL)
  • Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Medicines Evaluation Board (NL)
  • Dutch Pituitary Foundation, Nijkerk, The Netherlands.
  • Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (NL)
  • Dutch Thyroid Patient Organization (SON), Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
  • Department of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and -Economics, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Corresponding author
Korevaar, Joke C.
Venue
Thyroid
Published
2020-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
821-828
ISSN
  • 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9077
OpenAlex
W3012080138
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thyroid (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • ZonMw
  • Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
Keywords
levothyroxine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, primary hypothyroidism, drug shortages, hyperthyroidism, dose adjustment, thyroid hormone replacement, euthyroid patients, Netherlands, prescription data, laboratory test data
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Male, Middle Aged, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Drug Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review