Cited by 373Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Genetic progression in the pancreatic ducts

Open access
Hruban, Ralph H., Wilentz, Robb E., Kern, Scott E.·2000·The American Journal of Pathology

Abstract

The genetic progression described by Yamano et al in this issue of The American Journal of Pathology helps establish a progression model for pancreatic ductal carcinoma. This progression model has a number of important implications for the classification of lesions in the pancreas and for the future early detection and chemoprevention of pancreatic carcinoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65054-7

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GEMMs combining Kras mutation with inactivation of Cdkn2a and Tp53, or with inactivation of TGFβ-SMAD4 signaling, develop invasive and metastatic PDAC, validating these tumor suppressor pathways in PDAC progression.

    “GEMMs with compound mutations that combine Kras mutation with the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes Cdkn2a and Tp53, or with the inactivation of the TGFβ-SMAD4 signaling pathway in the pancreas develop invasive and metastatic PDAC (74–76), thus validating the role of these tumor suppressor pathways in PDAC progression (4).”

    From KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]9. Kozuka, S ∙ Sassa, R ∙ Taki, T ... Relation of pancreatic duct hyperplasia to carcinoma Cancer. 1979; 43:1418-1428 Crossref Scopus (309) PubMed Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hruban, R. H., Wilentz, R. E., & Kern, S. E.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
1821-1825
ISSN
0002-9440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980741832
Cited by
373
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal Of Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA62924)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA062924, CA 62924)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic ductal carcinoma, progression model, pancreatic duct, early detection, chemoprevention
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Pancreatic Ducts, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, Genes, ras, Gene Expression, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Disease Progression, Genes, erbB-2, Loss of Heterozygosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review