Satisfaction with and usage of a hand neuroprosthesis
Abstract
Objective To measure the satisfaction with, clinical impact of, and use of an implantable hand neuroprosthesis. Setting Eight different medical centers. Participants Thirty-four individuals with spinal cord injuries at the C5 or C6 motor level. Interventions Participants were implemented with a hand neuroprosthesis that provides grasp and release. The neuroprosthesis includes a surgically implanted stimulator, implanted electrodes sutured to the hand and forearm muscles, and an externally mounted controller. Main outcome measure A survey was mailed to study participants, who were asked to respond to statements such as "If I had it to do over, I would have the hand system implanted again," using a 5-level Likert scale ("strongly agree" to "strongly disagree"). Results Eighty-seven percent of participants were very satisfied with the neuroprosthesis, 88% reported a positive impact on their life, 87% reported improvements in activities of daily living, and 81% reported improved independence. Participants reported using the neuroprosthesis a median of 5.5 days per week; 15 participants used the neuroprosthesis 7 days per week, and 5 participants reported not using the device. Conclusions The neuroprosthesis was used by most participants. The neuroprosthesis performed satisfactorily, increased users' ability to perform activities of daily living and independence, and improved their quality of life.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FES has clinical applications for control of hand movements.
“for control of hand movements”
From A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems (2005) · cites this paper as Wuolle et al., 1999
Cites
An Implanted Upper-Extremity Neuroprosthesis. Follow-up of Five Patients*
KILGORE, K. L., PECKHAM, P. H., KEITH, M. W., THROPE, G. B., WUOLLE, K. S., BRYDEN, A. M., & HART, R. L. (1997) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-199704000-00008 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Navarro, X., Krueger, T. B., Lago, N., Micera, S., Stieglitz, T., & Dario, P. (2005) · Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System · doi:10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Weiland, J. D., Liu, W., & Humayun, M. S. (2005) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.060804.100435 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Peckham, P. H., Keith, M. W., Kilgore, K. L., Grill, J. H., Wuolle, K. S., Thrope, G. B., Gorman, P., Hobby, J., Mulcahey, M. J., Carroll, S., et al. (2001) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.25910 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Self-citationImplanted Neuroprosthesis for Restoring Arm and Hand Function in People With High Level Tetraplegia
Memberg, W. D., Polasek, K. H., Hart, R. L., Bryden, A. M., Kilgore, K. L., Nemunaitis, G. A., Hoyen, H. A., Keith, M. W., & Kirsch, R. F. (2014) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.028 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Self-citationDurability of implanted electrodes and leads in an upper-limb neuroprosthesis
Kilgore, K. L., Peckham, P. H., Keith, M. W., Montague, F. W., Hart, R. L., Gazdik, M. M., Bryden, A. M., Snyder, S. A., & Stage, T. G. (2003) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2003.11.0457 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citationRaspopovic, S., Carpaneto, J., Udina, E., Navarro, X., & Micera, S. (2010) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-7-17 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Bijak, M., Mayr, W., Girsch, W., Lanmüller, H., Unger, E., Stöhr, H., Thoma, H., & Plenk, H. (2001) · Artificial Organs · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1594.2001.025006467.x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wuolle, K. S., Van Doren, C. L., Bryden, A. M., Hunter Peckham, P., Keith, M. W., Kilgore, K. L., & Grill, J. H.
- Affiliations
- MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-213
- ISSN
- 0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977076149
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000080)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, patient satisfaction, device utilization, activities of daily living, independence, quality of life, implanted electrodes, grasp and release, upper limb prosthesis
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Hand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Quality of Life, Spinal Cord Injuries, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Prosthesis Implantation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review