Cited by 99Sleep and related disordersPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies for evaluating adherence to sleep restriction treatment for insomnia

Riedel, Brant W, Lichstein, Kenneth L·2001·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The methodology of assessing adherence to sleep restriction therapy for insomnia has received little attention in the empirical literature. The present study proposes and evaluates several approaches to assessing adherence to sleep restriction. We investigated multiple methods of measuring adherence and tested their utility by determining the strength of their association with treatment outcome in a sample of 22 older adults with insomnia (16 women, six men). As a group, the measures indicated reasonably good adherence to treatment recommendations. Time spent in bed was significantly reduced at post-treatment, and the night to night consistency of time spent in bed and arising time was significantly greater at post-treatment. However, time spent in bed per night at post-treatment still exceeded therapist recommendations by a mean of 27.89 min (SD=31.72). Greater consistency of time spent in bed per night and a more consistent arising time predicted a better treatment outcome. Measures of degree of bedtime reduction did not predict treatment outcome.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00002-4

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Riedel, B. W., & Lichstein, K. L.
Affiliations
University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Riedel, Brant W
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
201-212
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080241247
Cited by
99
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG12136, R01AG012136)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
sleep restriction therapy, insomnia, medication adherence, adherence measurement, time in bed, older adults, treatment outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Sleep Deprivation, Geriatric Assessment, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review