Cited by 127Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Relationships between thought-action fusion, thought suppression and obsessive–compulsive symptoms: a structural equation modeling approach

Open access
Rassin, Eric, Muris, Peter, Schmidt, Henk, Merckelbach, Harald·2000·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Research has shown that there are strong similarities in content between the obsessions and compulsions that characterize obsessive-compulsive disorder and nonclinical obsessions and compulsions. However, clinical and nonclinical obsessions and compulsions do differ with respect to characteristics like frequency, intensity, discomfort and elicited resistance. Two separate concepts have been invoked to explain how normal obsessions and compulsions may develop into clinical phenomena. First, it is suggested that thought-action fusion (TAF) contributes to obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Second, thought suppression may intensify obsessive-compulsive symptoms due to its paradoxical effect on intrusive thoughts. Although both phenomena have been found to contribute to obsessive-compulsive symptoms, possible interactions between these two have never been investigated. The current study explored how TAF and thought suppression interact in the development of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Undergraduate psychology students (N = 173) completed questionnaires pertaining to TAF, thought suppression and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Covariances between the scores on these questionnaires were analyzed by means of structural equation modeling. Results suggest that TAF triggers thought suppression, while thought suppression, in turn, promotes obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00104-7

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have shown associations between OCD and cognitive variables including inflated responsibility, threat perceptions, lowered memory confidence, difficulty tolerating uncertainty, perfectionism, thought-action fusion, and over-importance/need to control thoughts.

    “Several studies have shown associations between OCD and cognitive variables including inflated responsibility and threat perceptions, lowered confidence in memory, difficulty tolerating uncertainty, perfectionism, thought-action fusion, and the over-importance of and need to control thoughts (e.g. Abramowitz et al., 2006; Moore & Abramowitz, 2007; Rassin et al., 2000; Salkovskis et al., 2000; Shaf”

    From An update on the efficacy of psychological treatments for obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults (2013) · cites this paper as Rassin et al., 2000

    The Discussion reports correlations between thought-action fusion, thought suppression, and obsessive–compulsive symptom scores. This supports citing the study for those cognitive associations, but its participants were undergraduate students, so it does not establish associations in people diagnosed with OCD; it also does not test every variable in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R., & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical eects of thoughts suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 5±13.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rassin, E., Muris, P., Schmidt, H., & Merckelbach, H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Rassin, Eric
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
889-897
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124559892
Cited by
127
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
thought-action fusion, thought suppression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, obsession, compulsive behavior, intrusive thoughts, paradoxical effects, obsessive-compulsive disorder, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Compulsive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Obsessive Behavior, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Repression, Psychology, Thinking, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review