The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single Cell Mechanotransduction and Its Modulation Analyzed by Atomic Force Microscope Indentation
Open accessAbstract
The skeleton adapts to its mechanical usage, although at the cellular level, the distribution and magnitude of strains generated and their detection are ill-understood. The magnitude and nature of the strains to which cells respond were investigated using an atomic force microscope (AFM) as a microindentor. A confocal microscope linked to the setup enabled analysis of cellular responses. Two different cell response pathways were identified: one, consequent upon contact, depended on activation of stretch-activated ion channels; the second, following stress relaxation, required an intact microtubular cytoskeleton. The cellular responses could be modulated by selectively disrupting cytoskeletal components thought to be involved in the transduction of mechanical stimuli. The F-actin cytoskeleton was not required for responses to mechanical strain, whereas the microtubular and vimentin networks were. Treatments that reduced membrane tension, or its transmission, selectively reduced contact reactions. Immunostaining of the cell cytoskeleton was used to interpret the results of the cytoskeletal disruption studies. We provide an estimate of the cellular strain magnitude needed to elicit intracellular calcium responses and propose a model that links single cell responses to whole bone adaptation. This technique may help to understand adaptation to mechanical usage in other organs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The versatility and universality of calcium signalling
Berridge, M. J., Lipp, P., & Bootman, M. D. (2000) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/35036035 · Cited by 5,701
Malek, A. M., & Izumo, S. (1996) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.109.4.713 · Cited by 531
Cited by
Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients
Cross, S. E., Jin, Y.-S., Rao, J., & Gimzewski, J. K. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.388 · Cited by 1,908
Materials as stem cell regulators
Murphy, W. L., McDevitt, T. C., & Engler, A. J. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3937 · Cited by 947
Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy
Haase, K., & Pelling, A. E. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0970 · Cited by 396
Local Nanomechanical Motion of the Cell Wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Pelling, A. E., Sehati, S., Gralla, E. B., Valentine, J. S., & Gimzewski, J. K. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1097640 · Cited by 386
AFM: a versatile tool in biophysics
Alessandrini, A., & Facci, P. (2005) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/16/6/r01 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Charras, G. T., & Horton, M. A.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2970-2981
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110717087
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single Cell Mechanotransduction and Its Modulation Analyzed by Atomic Force Microscope Indentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75638-5
- The paper
- Charras, G. T., & Horton, M. A. (2002). Single Cell Mechanotransduction and Its Modulation Analyzed by Atomic Force Microscope Indentation. Biophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75638-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.