The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
On a confusion about a function of consciousness
Block, N. (1995) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00038188 · Cited by 3,364
Self-citationSolving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory
O'Regan, J. K. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0084327 · Cited by 997
Attention without awareness in blindsight
Kentridge, R. W., Heywood, C. A., & Weiskrantz, L. (1999) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0850 · Cited by 362
Rees, G. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.8.1624 · Cited by 268
(1996) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(96)20049-9 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Cited by
Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience
Block, N. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07002786 · Cited by 1,146
Self-citationBasic Emotions, Natural Kinds, Emotion Schemas, and a New Paradigm
Izard, C. E. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x · Cited by 1,110
Two neural correlates of consciousness
Block, N. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006 · Cited by 713
Self-citationRe-representing consciousness: dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness
Schooler, J. W. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01949-6 · Cited by 485
Event-related brain potential correlates of visual awareness
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.002 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Block, N.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 197-219
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964201266
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00129-3
- The paper
- Block, N. (2001). Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00129-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
