Cited by 384Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMedicine, History, and Philosophy

Age is strongly associated with alexithymia in the general population

Mattila, Aino K., Salminen, Jouko K., Nummi, Tapio, Joukamaa, Matti·2006·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective We studied the prevalence of alexithymia, its distribution in different age groups in a wide age range, its association with sociodemographic and health-related variables, and its co-occurrence with depression.Methods The study forms part of the Health 2000 Study. The original sample comprised 8028 subjects representing the general adult population of Finland. Alexithymia was measured with the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and depression was measured with the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory. Altogether, 5454 participants filled in TAS-20 in their mother tongue.Results The prevalence of alexithymia was 9.9%. Men (11.9%) were more commonly alexithymic than women (8.1%). Alexithymia was associated with male gender, increasing age, low educational level, poor perceived health, and depression.Conclusions The findings were in line with earlier population studies. For the first time, it was possible to analyze the prevalence of alexithymia in a wide age range (30-97 years). International comparative studies are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.013

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aging is associated with increased rates of alexithymia.

    “as well as increased rates of alexithymia (Joukamaa et al., 1996; Mattila et al., 2006; Paradiso et al., 2008 although see Gunzelmann et al., 2002).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Mattila et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mattila, A. K., Salminen, J. K., Nummi, T., & Joukamaa, M.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • University of Tampere (FI)
  • Tampere University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Mattila, Aino K.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
629-635
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047878655
Cited by
384
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
alexithymia, age, prevalence, depression, sex differences, educational attainment, health perception, sociodemographic factors, general adult population, Toronto Alexithymia Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Educational Status, Female, Finland, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review