Cited by 133Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychometric properties of the 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale and prevalence of alexithymia in a Finnish adolescent population

Säkkinen, Päivi, Kaltiala-Heino, Riittakerttu, Ranta, Klaus, Haataja, Riina, Joukamaa, Matti·2007·Psychosomatics

Abstract

The authors assessed, in an adolescent population sample, the internal consistency, test-retest stability, and factor structure of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and established the frequency of alexithymia in this age-group. Pupils (N=882; age-groups: 14-, 15-, and 16-year-olds) from two secondary schools completed the TAS-20 questionnaire twice, with a 5-week interval, in a classroom survey setting. TAS total and subscale scores and proportion of subjects exceeding the cut-point for alexithymia are reported for boys and girls. In confirmatory factor analysis, all estimates except one item were statistically significant; there was no gender difference. The authors conclude that the TAS-20 has good psychometric properties in adolescent samples. Alexithymia rate decreases from early to middle adolescence and remains essentially on a level similar to that among adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.psy.48.2.154

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescence is associated with elevated rates of alexithymia, particularly at the earlier stages of this period.

    “adolescence is associated with elevated rates of alexithymia (e.g. Gatta et al., 2014; Säkkinen et al., 2007, although see Honkalampi et al., 2009; Joukamaa et al., 2007), particularly at the earlier stages of this period (Gatta et al., 2014; Karukivi et al., 2014; Säkkinen et al., 2007).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Säkkinen et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Säkkinen, P., Kaltiala-Heino, R., Ranta, K., Haataja, R., & Joukamaa, M.
Affiliations
Turku University Hospital (FI)
Venue
Psychosomatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
154-161
ISSN
0033-3182 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978665854
Cited by
133
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Toronto Alexithymia Scale, alexithymia, adolescents, psychometric properties, internal consistency, test-retest stability, factor structure, prevalence, gender differences, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Child, Female, Finland, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review