Cited by 273Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsUterine Myomas and Treatments

Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis

Open access
Dueholm, Margit, Lundorf, Erik, Hansen, Estrid S, Sørensen, Joan Solgård, Ledertoug, Susanne, Olesen, Frede·2001·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To compare the diagnostic potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.Design Double blind set-up.Setting University medical school.Patient(s) We studied 106 consecutive premenopausal women who underwent hysterectomy for benign reasons.Intervention(s) Transvaginal ultrasonography and MRI were compared with histopathologic examination as the golden standard.Main outcome measure(s) Adenomyosis.Result(s) Twenty-two (21%) patients had adenomyosis. The sensitivity and specificity were as follows: sensitivity: MRI 0.70 (0.46-0.87) and TVS 0.68 (0.44-0.86) (P=.66); specificity: MRI 0.86 (0.76-0.93) and TVS 0.65 (0.50-0.77) (P=.03). The combination of MRI and TVS was most sensitive (0.89 [0.64-0.98]), but produced the lowest specificity (0.60 [0.44-0.73]). Adenomyosis was not detected by either MRI or TVS at uterine volumes >400 mL. Exclusion of uteri >400 mL from the analysis improved the diagnostic precision of MRI, but not that of TVS. The diagnostic accuracy at MRI was improved by calculating the maximum difference between the thinnest and thickest junctional zone (JZdif) (i.e., > or =5-7 mm).Conclusion(s) Magnetic resonance imaging was superior to TVS for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Magnetic resonance imaging had a higher specificity than TVS, but their sensitivities were in line. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI, as that of TVS, was at an intermediate level, but the diagnostic accuracy of the former improved by exclusion of uteri >400 mL. The combination of MRI and TVS produced the highest level of accuracy for exclusion of adenomyosis, but the low specificity may necessitate further investigation of positive findings. Measurement of the difference in junctional zone thickness may optimize the diagnosis of adenomyosis at MRI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01962-8

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a significant association of pelvic endometriosis with uterine adenomyosis in women and in the baboon with life-long infertility.

    “There is a significant association of pelvic endometriosis with uterine adenomyosis in women and in the baboon with life-long infertility.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dueholm, M., Lundorf, E., Hansen, E. S., Sørensen, J. S., Ledertoug, S., & Olesen, F.
Affiliations
Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Dueholm, Margit
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-09
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
588-594
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966951938
Cited by
273
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
adenomyosis, magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasound, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, uterine volume, premenopausal women, hysterectomy, histopathological diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Double-Blind Method, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Myometrium, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography, Vagina, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Premenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review