CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 311Endometriosis Research and TreatmentMenstrual Health and DisordersEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus a low-dose oral contraceptive for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

Open access
Vercellini, Paolo, Trespidi, Laura, Colombo, Alberto, Vendola, Nicoletta, Marchini, Maurizio, Crosignani, Pier Giorgio·1993·Fertility and Sterility
DOI 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56039-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of goserelin versus a low-dose cyclic oral contraceptive (OC) in improving pelvic pain in women with endometriosis and to compare recurrence of symptoms during follow-up.Design Open-label, randomized trial.Setting University hospital endometriosis center.Patients Fifty-seven women with moderate or severe pelvic pain and laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis.Interventions Six-month treatment with goserelin depot (n = 29) or a low-dose cyclic OC (n = 28) followed by 6-month follow-up.Main outcome measures Variation in severity of symptoms during treatment and at the end of follow-up as shown by a linear analog scale and a verbal rating scale.Results At 6 months of treatment, a significant reduction in deep dyspareunia was observed in both groups, with goserelin superior to the OC at linear analog scale assessment. Nonmenstrual pain was diminished on both scales without differences between treatments. Women taking the OC experienced a significant reduction in dysmenorrhea. At the end of follow-up, symptoms reappeared without differences in severity between the groups.Conclusions Low-dose cyclic OCs may be a valuable alternative for the treatment of dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pain associated with endometriosis. Symptoms recurred in most subjects 6 months after drug withdrawal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56039-7

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vercellini P, Crosignani PG. Epidemiology of endometriosis. In: Brosens I, Donnez J, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Endometriosis; 1992 June 1–3; Brussels. Casterton Hall: Parthenon Publishing. In press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 311

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Vercellini, P., Trespidi, L., Colombo, A., Vendola, N., Marchini, M., & Crosignani, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-07
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
75-79
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56039-7
OpenAlex
W252619442
Cited by
311
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, pelvic pain, goserelin, GnRH agonist, low-dose oral contraceptives, dysmenorrhea, deep dyspareunia, symptom recurrence, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptives, Oral, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia, Endometriosis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Pain, Recurrence, Goserelin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review