Cited by 118Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

The second-look laparoscopy for evaluation of the result of medical treatment of endometriosis should not be performed during ovarian suppression

Open access
Evers, Johannes L.H.·1987·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Some authors have evaluated the efficacy of medical treatment for endometriosis by SLL at termination of therapy. The appearance of endometriotic lesions depends on ovarian activity. We studied the appearance of endometriotic lesions at SLL during the last week of treatment with danazol and compared it with the appearance of SLL in the second cycle after the end of treatment. A difference was noted and was attributed to the effect of stimulation of the endometriotic foci by ovarian activity. Danazol does not eradicate endometriosis. When suppression is discontinued, the disease will return with time. We conclude that performing an SLL during ovarian suppression, for evaluation of the effect of medical therapy of endometriosis, is a misleading procedure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59062-1

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suppression instead of elimination of implants is the only realistic objective of pharmacological intervention for endometriosis.

    “suppression instead of elimination of implants is the only realistic objective of pharmacological intervention”
  • For the present, the therapeutic target is not endometriosis cytoreduction, but suppression, which implies the survival of ectopic implants independently of the drug type, dosage, and duration of use.

    “for the present the therapeutic target is not endometriosis cytoreduction, but suppression, which implies the survival of ectopic implants independently of the drug type, dosage, and duration of use (Evers, 1987)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evers, J. L. H.
Affiliations
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Evers, Johannes L.H.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
502-504
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2399859972
Cited by
118
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, second-look laparoscopy, ovarian suppression, danazol, ovarian function, treatment response assessment
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Danazol, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Ovary, Pelvic Neoplasms, Laparoscopy, Pregnadienes, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review