Cited by 348CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCrystallization and Solubility StudiesCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition

Experimental study of brucite dissolution and precipitation in aqueous solutions: Surface speciation and chemical affinity control

Pokrovsky, Oleg S., Schott, Jacques·2004·Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0016-7037(03)00238-2

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pH of the solutions was not high enough to initiate brucite formation at the end of the experiments.

    “as the pH of the solutions was not high enough to initiate brucite formation (Pokrovsky and Schott, 2004; Li et al., 2014) at the end of the experiments.”
  • The limited effect of nucleation surface area is related to the fact that the secondary minerals reached close-to-equilibrium conditions with the fluid relatively quickly, thus their formation rates were primarily driven by the affinity term (1-SI_m), rather than the surface area of the nuclei and crystals.

    “This observation is related to the fact that the secondary minerals reached close-to-equilibrium conditions with the fluid relatively quickly, thus their formation rates were primarily driven by the affinity term (1-SI m ), rather than the surface area of the nuclei and crystals (Pokrovsky and Schott, 2004).”
  • The reactivity of ultramafic mine waste is enhanced by increased surface area due to mineral processing, yet dissolution rates remain sluggish at the alkaline pH of process waters.

    “The reactivity of ultramafic mine waste is enhanced by increased surface area due to mineral processing, yet dissolution rates remain sluggish at the alkaline pH of process waters [11,38,[52][53][54][55].”

    From Strategizing carbon-neutral mines: A case for pilot projects (2014) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pokrovsky, O. S., & Schott, J.
Venue
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
31-45
ISSN
0016-7037 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090430868
Cited by
348
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Crystallization and Solubility Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Keywords
brucite, magnesium hydroxide, dissolution kinetics, precipitation kinetics, surface speciation, surface charge, isoelectric point, transition state theory, saturation index, surface hydroxylation, electric double layer, rate law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review