Cited by 762

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids

Muir, Bonnie M.·1987·International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

DOI 10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80013-5

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80013-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models
Rasmussen, J. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313160 · Cited by 3,434
Trust in close relationships.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 · Cited by 3,146

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

Hopple, 1986, Decision aiding dangers: The law of the hammer and other maxims, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-16, 948, 10.1109/TSMC.1986.4309013 · DOI
Rempel, 1986, How do I trust thee?, Psychology Today, 28
Rotter, 1980, Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility, American Psychologist, 35, 1, 10.1037/0003-066X.35.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
Rouse, 1986, Understanding and enhancing user acceptance of computer technology, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-16, 965, 10.1109/TSMC.1986.4309014 · DOI
Sage, 1981, Behavioral and organizational considerations in the design of information systems and processes for planning and decision support, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-11, 640, 10.1109/TSMC.1981.4308761 · DOI
Sheridan, 1980, Computer control and human alienation, Technology Review, 61
Sheridan, 1983, Adapting automation to man, culture and society, Automatica, 19, 605, 10.1016/0005-1098(83)90024-9 · DOI

Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
A trust model for consumer Internet shopping
Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044227 · Cited by 2,012
Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M., & Drury, C. G. (2000) · International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics · doi:10.1207/s15327566ijce0401_04 · Cited by 1,799
The role of trust in automation reliance
Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00038-7 · Cited by 1,276
Trust in automation. Part II. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation
MUIR, B. M., & MORAY, N. (1996) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139608964474 · Cited by 993
Self-citation
Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation
Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007 · Cited by 932
Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced 'Complacency'
Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0301_1 · Cited by 875
Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems
MUIR, B. M. (1994) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139408964957 · Cited by 873
Self-citation
A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making
Burton, J. W., Stein, M., & Jensen, T. B. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2155 · Cited by 814
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3387166 · Cited by 785
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.11839 · Cited by 783
Applied artificial intelligence and trust—the case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices
Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014 · Cited by 661
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000092 · Cited by 614
Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500337708 · Cited by 577
Not All Trust Is Created Equal: Dispositional and History-Based Trust in Human-Automation Interactions
Merritt, S. M., & Ilgen, D. R. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288574 · Cited by 527
Metrics for explainable AI: challenges and prospects
Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., Klein, G., & Litman, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.04608 · Cited by 518
The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design
Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2005) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001 · Cited by 508
Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity
Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005 · Cited by 388
The Perceived Utility of Human and Automated Aids in a Visual Detection Task
Dzindolet, M. T., Pierce, L. G., Beck, H. P., & Dawe, L. A. (2002) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/0018720024494856 · Cited by 386
Explanations in Autonomous Driving: A Survey
Omeiza, D., Webb, H., Jirotka, M., & Kunze, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3122865 · Cited by 355
An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector
Aoki, N. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490 · Cited by 350
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114 · Cited by 336
Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation
Körber, M. (2019) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_2 · Cited by 317
Measurement of trust in automation: A narrative review and reference guide
Kohn, S. C., de Visser, E. J., Wiese, E., Lee, Y.-C., & Shaw, T. H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604977 · Cited by 315
Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Study of the Effects of Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
Wang, X., & Yin, M. (2021) · 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3397481.3450650 · Cited by 320
“Finally, for RQ3 , we evaluated participants’ capability of calibrating their trust in the ML model using three main dependent variables, including their appropriate trust [51–53, 56”
Method
The more you know: Trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency
Kraus, J., Scholz, D., Stiegemeier, D., & Baumann, M. (2020) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819853686 · Cited by 276
“Information fostering system transparency in advance or during the drive should facilitate trust calibration (Muir, 1987).”
BackgroundInfluential
Measures for explainable AI: Explanation goodness, user satisfaction, mental models, curiosity, trust, and human-AI performance
Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., Klein, G., & Litman, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1096257 · Cited by 272
Proxy tasks and subjective measures can be misleading in evaluating explainable AI systems
Buçinca, Z., Lin, P., Gajos, K. Z., & Glassman, E. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3377325.3377498 · Cited by 307
Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids
Madhavan, P., Wiegmann, D. A., & Lacson, F. C. (2006) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872006777724408 · Cited by 268
The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning
de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00039-9 · Cited by 264
Attributions of Trust in Decision Support Technologies: A Study of Recommendation Agents for E-Commerce
Wang, W., & Benbasat, I. (2008) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240410 · Cited by 241
Automation-induced complacency for monitoring highly reliable systems: the role of task complexity, system experience, and operator trust
Bailey, N. R., & Scerbo, M. W. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500535301 · Cited by 224
Supporting Trust Calibration and the Effective Use of Decision Aids by Presenting Dynamic System Confidence Information
McGuirl, J. M., & Sarter, N. B. (2006) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872006779166334 · Cited by 212
Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations
Wang, N., Pynadath, D. V., & Hill, S. G. (2016) · 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451741 · Cited by 220
Evaluating Effects of User Experience and System Transparency on Trust in Automation
Yang, X. J., Unhelkar, V. V., Li, K., & Shah, J. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020230 · Cited by 208
Understanding User Trust in Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Systems: Evidence from China
Qin, F., Li, K., & Yan, J. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12994 · Cited by 204
How do visual explanations foster end users' appropriate trust in machine learning?
Yang, F., Huang, Z., Scholtz, J., & Arendt, D. L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3377325.3377480 · Cited by 200
Effects of changing reliability on trust of robot systems
Desai, M., Medvedev, M., Vázquez, M., McSheehy, S., Gadea-Omelchenko, S., Bruggeman, C., Steinfeld, A., & Yanco, H. (2012) · Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2157689.2157702 · Cited by 188
Rapid Trust Calibration through Interpretable and Uncertainty-Aware AI
Tomsett, R., Preece, A., Braines, D., Cerutti, F., Chakraborty, S., Srivastava, M., Pearson, G., & Kaplan, L. (2020) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100049 · Cited by 186
I'm Sorry, Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Chatbot Perception and Expectations
Zamora, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction · doi:10.1145/3125739.3125766 · Cited by 164
Calibrating trust through knowledge: Introducing the concept of informed safety for automation in vehicles
Khastgir, S., Birrell, S., Dhadyalla, G., & Jennings, P. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.001 · Cited by 134
Understanding the Effect of Out-of-distribution Examples and Interactive Explanations on Human-AI Decision Making
Liu, H., Lai, V., & Tan, C. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479552 · Cited by 111
Overtrust in External Cues of Automated Vehicles: An Experimental Investigation
Holländer, K., Wintersberger, P., & Butz, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications · doi:10.1145/3342197.3344528 · Cited by 109
A Review on Human–Machine Trust Evaluation: Human-Centric and Machine-Centric Perspectives
Gebru, B., Zeleke, L., Blankson, D., Nabil, M., Nateghi, S., Homaifar, A., & Tunstel, E. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2022.3144956 · Cited by 101
Design Considerations for Real-Time Collaboration with Creative Artificial Intelligence
McCormack, J., Hutchings, P., Gifford, T., Yee-King, M., Llano, M. T., & D’inverno, M. (2020) · Organised Sound · doi:10.1017/s1355771819000451 · Cited by 101
Establishing Appropriate Trust via Critical States
Huang, S. H., Bhatia, K., Abbeel, P., & Dragan, A. D. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2018.8593649 · Cited by 94
User Trust Dynamics: An Investigation Driven by Differences in System Performance
Yu, K., Berkovsky, S., Taib, R., Conway, D., Zhou, J., & Chen, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3025171.3025219 · Cited by 90
Trust and social engineering in human robot interaction: Will a robot make you disclose sensitive information, conform to its recommendations or gamble?
Aroyo, A. M., Rea, F., Sandini, G., & Sciutti, A. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2856272 · Cited by 85
Trust repair in human-agent teams: the effectiveness of explanations and expressing regret
Kox, E. S., Kerstholt, J. H., Hueting, T. F., & de Vries, P. W. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-021-09515-9 · Cited by 83
How Do We Assess the Trustworthiness of AI? Introducing the Trustworthiness Assessment Model (TrAM)
Schlicker, N., Baum, K., Uhde, A., Sterz, S., Hirsch, M. C., & Langer, M. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qhwvx · Cited by 79
Explanations and Expectations: Trust Building in Automated Vehicles
Haspiel, J., Du, N., Meyerson, J., Robert Jr., L. P., Tilbury, D., Yang, X. J., & Pradhan, A. K. (2018) · Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3173386.3177057 · Cited by 79
Effects of Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision Making: Principles and Comparisons
Wang, X., & Yin, M. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3519266 · Cited by 74
Theoretical considerations and development of a questionnaire to measure trust in automation
Körber, M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nfc45 · Cited by 71
Designing for Situation Awareness and Trust in Automation
Wickens, C. D. (1995) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)46646-8 · Cited by 68
More Human-Likeness, More Trust?: The Effect of Anthropomorphism on Self-Reported and Behavioral Trust in Continued and Interdependent Human-Agent Cooperation
Kulms, P., & Kopp, S. (2019) · Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019 · doi:10.1145/3340764.3340793 · Cited by 68
In a Silent Way: Communication Between AI and Improvising Musicians Beyond Sound
McCormack, J., Gifford, T., Hutchings, P., Llano Rodriguez, M. T., Yee-King, M., & d'Inverno, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300268 · Cited by 64
Improving the radiologist-CAD interaction: designing for appropriate trust
Jorritsma, W., Cnossen, F., & van Ooijen, P. M. A. (2015) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2014.09.017 · Cited by 61
VIRTSI: a novel trust dynamics model enhancing artificial intelligence collaboration with human users-insights from a ChatGPT evaluation study
Virvou, M., Tsihrintzis, G. A., & Tsichrintzi, E.-A. (2024) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2024.120759 · Cited by 55
The description-experience gap in the effect of warning reliability on user trust and performance in a phishing-detection context
Chen, J., Mishler, S., Hu, B., Li, N., & Proctor, R. W. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.05.010 · Cited by 50
Two Routes to Trust Calibration: Effects of Reliability and Brand Information on Trust in Automation
Kraus, J. M., Forster, Y., Hergeth, S., & Baumann, M. (2019) · International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction · doi:10.4018/ijmhci.2019070101 · Cited by 42
Explainability and AI Confidence in Clinical Decision Support Systems: Effects on Trust, Diagnostic Performance, and Cognitive Load in Breast Cancer Care
Rezaeian, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Asan, O. (2026) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2539458 · Cited by 39
Explainability and AI confidence in clinical decision support systems: effects on trust, diagnostic performance, and cognitive load in breast Cancer care
Rezaeian, O., Bayrak, A. E., & Asan, O. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.16693 · Cited by 39
Why Are People’s Decisions Sometimes Worse with Computer Support?
Alberdi, E., Strigini, L., Povyakalo, A. A., & Ayton, P. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04468-7_3 · Cited by 29
Evaluating the Performance-Shaping Factors of Air Traffic Controllers Using Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy BWM Approach
Bongo, M. F., & Seva, R. R. (2023) · Aerospace · doi:10.3390/aerospace10030252 · Cited by 28
A Computational Model of Coupled Human Trust and Self-confidence Dynamics
Williams, K. J., Yuh, M. S., & Jain, N. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3594715 · Cited by 18
Investigating appropriate reliance on AI-Based decision support systems: the role of expertise, trust, and self-confidence
Dogru, E. Ö., & Krämer, N. C. (2025) · Journal of Decision Systems · doi:10.1080/12460125.2025.2593251 · Cited by 15
“Conversely, reliable systems may be underutilised if deemed untrustworthy (Lee & Moray, 1992; Muir, 1987).”
Communicating Missing Causal Information to Explain a Robot’s Past Behavior
Han, Z., & Yanco, H. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3568024 · Cited by 11
Workshop on Trust and Reliance in AI-Human Teams (TRAIT)
Bansal, G., Buçinca, Z., Holstein, K., Hullman, J., Smith-Renner, A. M., Stumpf, S., & Wu, S. (2023) · Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544549.3573831 · Cited by 8
Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders
Hoppe, J. A., Melkas, H., Pekkarinen, S., Tuisku, O., Hennala, L., Johansson-Pajala, R.-M., Gustafsson, C., & Thommes, K. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2081283 · Cited by 7
On the Need to Rethink Trust in AI Assistants for Software Development: A Critical Review
Baltes, S., Speith, T., Chiteri, B., Mohsenimofidi, S., Chakraborty, S., & Buschek, D. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2026.3659804 · Cited by 5
Exploring the impact of classification probabilities on users' trust in ambiguous instances
Dos Santos Ribeiro, D., Barbosa, G. D. J., Do Carmo Silva, M., Lopes, H., & Barbosa, S. D. J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vl/hcc51201.2021.9576291 · Cited by 4

Authors: Muir, B. M.
Venue: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 1987-11
Volume: 27
Issue: 5-6
Pages: 527-539
ISSN: 0020-7373 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80013-5
OpenAlex: W2020785866
Cited by: 762
References: 3
FWCI: 2.61
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.

Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Metadata

Record

About these checks

Data sources