The base substitution fidelity of eucaryotic DNA polymerases. Mispairing frequencies, site preferences, insertion preferences, and base substitution by dislocation.
Open accessAbstract
The base substitution fidelity of DNA polymerase-alpha, -beta, and -gamma (pol-alpha, -beta, and -gamma, respectively) has been determined in vitro, for all 12 possible mispairs at 96 sites in a forward mutational target. Averaging all errors over all known detectable sites, pol-gamma is the most accurate enzyme, producing one error for every 10,000 bases polymerized. Pol-beta is much less accurate, with an error rate of 1/1,500, while pol-alpha has an intermediate accuracy of 1/4,000. The relative differences in fidelity between the DNA polymerases are strongly influenced by the nature of the mispair. For example, G(template):dATP mispairs and G:dGTP mispairs are formed with about equal frequency by all three classes of DNA polymerases, yet pol-gamma produces T:dGTP mispairs at a 100-fold lower frequency than does pol-beta. The DNA polymerases exhibit distinct differences in template site preferences as well as substrate insertion preferences. The increase in accuracy apparent in proceeding from the least selective to the most accurate enzyme results primarily from a decrease in mispair formations at template A and T residues and a decrease in misinsertion of pyrimidine deoxynucleotides. These data clearly demonstrate a major role for eucaryotic DNA polymerases in modulating base mispair frequencies at the level of insertion. In addition to direct mispair formation due to an incorrect incorporation event, an examination of the errors produced by each of the three classes of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other spontaneous mutations occur in DNA aside from tautomerisation.
“other spontaneous mutations will also take place in DNA aside from tautomerisation 54,55”
From An open quantum systems approach to proton tunnelling in DNA (2022) · cites this paper as [54]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
8-Hydroxyguanine, an abundant form of oxidative DNA damage, causes G-T and A-C substitutions.
Cheng, K. C., Cahill, D. S., Kasai, H., Nishimura, S., & Loeb, L. A. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)48474-8 · Cited by 1,844 · see citing works
A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes.
Drake, J. W. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.16.7160 · Cited by 1,199 · see citing works
Kunkel, T. A., & Bebenek, K. (2000) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.497 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
Self-citationHuang, M.-M., Arnheim, N., & Goodman, M. F. (1992) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/20.17.4567 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Active Site Tightness and Substrate Fit in DNA Replication
Kool, E. T. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135453 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Visualizing transient Watson–Crick-like mispairs in DNA and RNA duplexes
Kimsey, I. J., Petzold, K., Sathyamoorthy, B., Stein, Z. W., & Al-Hashimi, H. M. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14227 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
The specificity of UV-induced mutations at an endogenous locus in mammalian cells.
Drobetsky, E. A., Grosovsky, A. J., & Glickman, B. W. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.24.9103 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Factors that influence the mutagenic patterns of DNA adducts from chemical carcinogens
Seo, K.-Y., Jelinsky, S. A., & Loechler, E. L. (2000) · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · doi:10.1016/s1383-5742(00)00047-8 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
An open quantum systems approach to proton tunnelling in DNA
Slocombe, L., Sacchi, M., & Al-Khalili, J. (2022) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00881-8 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
The Frameshift Infidelity of Human DNA Polymerase λ
Bebenek, K., Garcia-Diaz, M., Blanco, L., & Kunkel, T. A. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m305705200 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kunkel, T. A., & Alexander, P. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Kunkel, T A
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1986-01
- Volume
- 261
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 160-166
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1576472122
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Keywords
- DNA polymerase fidelity, DNA polymerase alpha, DNA polymerase beta, DNA polymerase gamma
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Cattle, Chickens, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Methylation, Mutation, Substrate Specificity, Transfection, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review