Cited by 299DNA Repair MechanismsDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryGenetic factors in colorectal cancer

The base substitution fidelity of eucaryotic DNA polymerases. Mispairing frequencies, site preferences, insertion preferences, and base substitution by dislocation.

Open access
Kunkel, T A, Alexander, P S·1986·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The base substitution fidelity of DNA polymerase-alpha, -beta, and -gamma (pol-alpha, -beta, and -gamma, respectively) has been determined in vitro, for all 12 possible mispairs at 96 sites in a forward mutational target. Averaging all errors over all known detectable sites, pol-gamma is the most accurate enzyme, producing one error for every 10,000 bases polymerized. Pol-beta is much less accurate, with an error rate of 1/1,500, while pol-alpha has an intermediate accuracy of 1/4,000. The relative differences in fidelity between the DNA polymerases are strongly influenced by the nature of the mispair. For example, G(template):dATP mispairs and G:dGTP mispairs are formed with about equal frequency by all three classes of DNA polymerases, yet pol-gamma produces T:dGTP mispairs at a 100-fold lower frequency than does pol-beta. The DNA polymerases exhibit distinct differences in template site preferences as well as substrate insertion preferences. The increase in accuracy apparent in proceeding from the least selective to the most accurate enzyme results primarily from a decrease in mispair formations at template A and T residues and a decrease in misinsertion of pyrimidine deoxynucleotides. These data clearly demonstrate a major role for eucaryotic DNA polymerases in modulating base mispair frequencies at the level of insertion. In addition to direct mispair formation due to an incorrect incorporation event, an examination of the errors produced by each of the three classes of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0021-9258(17)42446-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other spontaneous mutations occur in DNA aside from tautomerisation.

    “other spontaneous mutations will also take place in DNA aside from tautomerisation 54,55”

    From An open quantum systems approach to proton tunnelling in DNA (2022) · cites this paper as [54]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kunkel, T. A., & Alexander, P. S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-01
Volume
261
Issue
1
Pages
160-166
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1576472122
Cited by
299
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Keywords
DNA polymerase fidelity, DNA polymerase alpha, DNA polymerase beta, DNA polymerase gamma
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cattle, Chickens, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Methylation, Mutation, Substrate Specificity, Transfection, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review