The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developmental changes in face processing skills
Abstract
Expertise in processing differences among faces in the spacing among facial features (second-order relations) is slower to develop than expertise in processing the shape of individual features or the shape of the external contour. To determine the impact of the slow development of sensitivity to second-order relations on various face-processing skills, we developed five computerized tasks that require matching faces on the basis of identity (with changed facial expression or head orientation), facial expression, gaze direction, and sound being spoken. In Experiment 1, we evaluated the influence of second-order relations on performance on each task by presenting them to adults (N=48) who viewed the faces either upright or inverted. Previous studies have shown that inversion has a larger effect on tasks that require processing the spacing among features than it does on tasks that can be solved by processing the shape of individual features. Adults showed an inversion effect for only one task: matching facial identity when there was a change in head orientation. In Experiment 2, we administered the same tasks to children aged 6, 8, and 10 years (N=72). Compared to adults, 6-year-olds made more errors on every task and 8-year-olds made more errors on three of the five tasks: matching direction of gaze and the two facial identity tasks. Ten-year-olds made more errors than adults on only one task: matching facial identity when there was a change in head orientation (e.g., from frontal to tilted up). Together, the results indicate that the slow development of sensitivity to second-order relations causes children to be especially poor at recognizing the identity of a face when it is seen in a new orientation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In view of these early preferences, it has come as a surprise that specialised face processing mechanisms, at both the behavioural level and the neural level, continue to develop throughout the first and even the second decade of life (Carey et al., 1980; Durand et al., 2007; Mondloch et al., 2003).”
From The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies (2011) · cites this paper as Mondloch et al., 2003
In the citing paper
“The 10-year-olds made more errors than did adults on the identity task in which head orientation varied.”
From The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies (2011) · cites this paper as Mondloch et al. (2003)
Citations
Cites
Yin, R. K. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027474 · Cited by 2,624
The many faces of configural processing
Maurer, D. M., Grand, R. L., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01903-4 · Cited by 2,114
Self-citationWhy faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. E. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,584
Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. E. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,521
Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/72140 · Cited by 1,418 · cited 1×
“Since the classic study by Yin (1969), it has been known that inversion impairs adults ability to identify faces much more than their ability to identify other mono-oriented objects (unless they have developed face-like expertise for another homogeneous category—e.g., Diamond & Carey, 1986; Gauthier, Skudlarski, Gore,…”
BackgroundFrom Piecemeal to Configurational Representation of Faces
Carey, S. E., & Diamond, R. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.831281 · Cited by 844
Ellis, H. D., Shepherd, J. W., & DAVIES, G. M. (1979) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p080431 · Cited by 715
Adult's Eyes Trigger Shifts of Visual Attention in Human Infants
Hood, B. M., Willen, J. D., & Driver, J. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00024 · Cited by 682
Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing
Mondloch, C. J., Grand, R. L., & Maurer, D. M. (2002) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p3339 · Cited by 654
Self-citationFifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach.
Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.1.54 · Cited by 615
Early visual experience and face processing
Grand, R. L., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D. M., & Brent, H. P. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35073749 · Cited by 578
Self-citationThe Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence
Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p3012 · Cited by 549
When Inverted Faces are Recognized: The Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition
Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755889 · Cited by 529
In the Eye of the Beholder: The Science of Face Perception
Bruce, V., & Young, A. W. (1998) · Cited by 453
Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?
Carey, S. E., & Diamond, R. (1994) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506289408402302 · Cited by 422
Development of face recognition: A maturational component?
Carey, S., Diamond, R., & Woods, B. (1980) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.4.257 · Cited by 417
Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features
Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Flude, B. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1985) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p140737 · Cited by 359
Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity
Collishaw, S., & HOLE, G. J. (2000) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p2949 · Cited by 258
Infant Discrimination of Facial Expressions
Young-Browne, G., Rosenfeld, H. M., & Horowitz, F. D. (1977) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1128653 · Cited by 235
Pascalis, O., de Haan, M. D. H., Nelson, C. A., & de Schonen, S. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.1.249 · Cited by 214
Emotional expression in upside‐down faces: Evidence for configurational and componential processing
McKelvie, S. J. (1995) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1995.tb01067.x · Cited by 199
Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants
de Haan, M. D. H., Johnson, M. H., Maurer, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/s0885-2014(01)00051-x · Cited by 198
Self-citationLocal and Relational Aspects of Face Distinctiveness
Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755777 · Cited by 197
Infant Sensitivity to Adult Eye Direction
Hains, S. M. J., & Muir, D. W. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01836.x · Cited by 181
Testing face processing skills in children
Bruce, V., Campbell, R. N., Doherty‐Sneddon, G., Langton, S., McAuley, S., & Wright, R. (2000) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151000165715 · Cited by 178
Gaze detection and the cortical processing of faces: Evidence from infants and adults
Vecera, S. P., & Johnson, M. H. (1995) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506289508401722 · Cited by 177
Freire, A., & Lee, K. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.2001.2639 · Cited by 164
Infant Sensitivity to Adult Eye Direction
Hains, S. M. J., & Muir, D. W. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131602 · Cited by 160
Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration
Barton, J. J. S., Keenan, J. P., & Bass, T. (2001) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712601162329 · Cited by 157
Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces
Murray, J. E., Yong, E., & Rhodes, G. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00294 · Cited by 155
The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: current perspectives
Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. M. (2001) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.238 · Cited by 146
Face processing in autistics: Evidence for a generalised deficit?
Gepner, B., de Gelder, B., & de Schonen, S. (1996) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049608401357 · Cited by 139
The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing
Geldart, S., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D. M., de Schonen, S., & Brent, H. P. (2002) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00242 · Cited by 128
Self-citationRecognition of Mother's Photographed Face by the Three-Month-Old Infant
Barrera, M. E., & Maurer, D. M. (1981) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1129196 · Cited by 126
Self-citationThe Development of Differential Use of Inner and Outer Face Features in Familiar Face Identification
Campbell, R., Walker, J., & Baron‐Cohen, S. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1009 · Cited by 115
The Development of Face Recognition: Featural or Configurational Processing?
Baenninger, M. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1994.1018 · Cited by 109
Want, S. C., Pascalis, O., Coleman, M., & Blades, M. (2003) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1348/026151003321164663 · Cited by 84
Brace, N. A., HOLE, G. J., Kemp, R. I., Pike, G. E., Duuren, M. V., & Norgate, L. (2001) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p3059 · Cited by 81
The development of face processing skills
Ellis, H. D. (1992) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0013 · Cited by 80
Attention deficits in adolescents with ADHD and other clinical groups
Macleod, D., & Prior, M. R. (1996) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049608401345 · Cited by 62
RECOGNITION OF EMOTION FROM INVERTED SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS OF FACES
Fallshore, M., & Bartholow, J. (2003) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.236 · Cited by 53
Recognition of Parts of Famous-Face Photographs by Children: An Experimental Note
Campbell, R., & Tuck, M. (1995) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p240451 · Cited by 42
FACE RECOGNITION IN CHILDREN WITH EARLY RIGHT OR LEFT BRAIN DAMAGE
Mancini, J., de Schonen, S., Deruelle, C., & Massoulier, A. (1994) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.1994.tb11824.x · Cited by 40
Overt and Covert Recognition of Faces in Children and Adults
Newcombe, N. S., & Lie, E. (1995) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00599.x · Cited by 27
Experiential influences on the development of face perception
Geldart, S. S. (2000) · MacSphere (McMaster University) · doi:10.71548/11188 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
(2016) · doi:10.3389/fpsyg · Cited by 801
Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About
Sinha, P., Balas, B., Ostrovsky, Y., & Russell, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.884093 · Cited by 674
Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception
Rossion, B. (2008) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003 · Cited by 552
Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race
Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C.-S., & Caldara, R. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x · Cited by 456
Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.
Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023 · Cited by 416
Metadata
- Authors
- Mondloch, C. J., Geldart, S., Maurer, D., & Grand, R. L.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mondloch, Catherine J
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-84
- ISSN
- 0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119997223
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- face processing, face recognition (cognition), developmental changes, children, face inversion effect, head orientation, face identity, facial expressions, gaze direction
- MeSH terms
- Child, Child Development, Eye Movements, Face, Female, Head, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Posture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
