Cited by 285Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Dose-Dependent Effects of the Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonists A77636 or SKF81297 On Spatial Working Memory in Aged Monkeys

Cai, J.X., Arnsten, A.F.T.·1997·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

With advancing age, monkeys develop deficits in spatial working memory resembling those induced by lesions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Aged monkeys also exhibit marked loss of dopamine from the PFC, a transmitter known to be important for proper PFC cognitive function. Previous results suggest that D1 agonist treatment can improve spatial working memory abilities in aged monkeys. However, this research was limited by the use of drugs with either partial agonist actions or significant D2 receptor actions. In our study, the selective dopamine D1 receptor full agonists A77636 and SKF81297 were examined in aged monkeys for effects on the working memory functions of the PFC. Both compounds produced a significant, dose-related effect on delayed response performance without evidence of side effects: low doses improved performance although higher doses impaired or had no effect on performance. Both the improvement and impairment in performance were reversed by pretreatment with the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390. These findings are consistent with previous results demonstrating that there is a narrow range of D1 receptor stimulation for optimal PFC cognitive function, and suggest that very low doses of D1 receptor agonists may have cognitive-enhancing actions in the elderly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)36983-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, J. X., & Arnsten, A. F. T.
Affiliations
Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
Corresponding author
Arnsten, A.F.T.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
283
Issue
1
Pages
183-189
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135550220
Cited by
285
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG06036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF 81297, spatial working memory, aged monkeys, prefrontal cortex, cognitive aging, dose-dependent effects, SCH 23390, dopamine depletion
MeSH terms
Adamantane, Aging, Animals, Benzazepines, Benzopyrans, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Memory, Prefrontal Cortex, Receptors, Dopamine D1, Dopamine Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review