Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition of Neuronal Na+ Channels by Antidepressant Drugs

Pancrazio, Joseph J., Kamatchi, Ganesan L., Roscoe, Amy K., Lynch, Carl·1998·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

Although tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) blockade of cardiac Na+ channels is appreciated, actions on neuronal Na+ channels are less clear. Therefore, the effects of TCAs (amitriptyline, doxepin and desipramine) as well as trazdone and fluoxetine on voltage-gated Na+ current (INa) were examined in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells using the whole-cell patch-clamp method. Amitriptyline produced concentration-dependent depression of peak INa evoked from a holding potential of -80 mV with KD value of 20.2 microM and a Hill coefficient of 1.2. Although 20 microM amitriptyline induced no change in the rate or voltage dependence of INa activation, steady-state inactivation demonstrated a 15-mV hyperpolarizing shift. Similar results were observed for doxepin and desipramine. This shift in steady-state inactivation was associated with a slowed rate of recovery from the inactivated state. Contrasting results were observed with the atypical antidepressants: while 20 microM fluoxetine depressed peak INa by 61% and caused a 7-mV hyperpolarizing shift in steady-state inactivation, 100 microM trazodone decreased peak INa by only 19% and caused only a 3-mV shift. Although the magnitude of fluoxetine effects was similar to those of the TCAs, the onset of fluoxetine effects was substantially slower than for amitriptyline. In voltage-clamp and current-clamp measurements from neonatal rat dorsal root ganglion neurons, 20 microM amitriptyline decreased INa by 52% and depressed action potential dynamics consistent with enhanced Na+ channel inactivation. The effects of the TCAs on INa are similar to local anesthetic behavior and could contribute to certain analgesic actions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(24)37206-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Pancrazio, J. J., Kamatchi, G. L., Roscoe, A. K., & Lynch, C.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
284
Issue
1
Pages
208-214
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1900387932
Cited by
311
References
29
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inhibition of Neuronal Na+ Channels by Antidepressant Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-3565(24)37206-4
The paper
Pancrazio, J. J., Kamatchi, G. L., Roscoe, A. K., & Lynch, C. (1998). Inhibition of Neuronal Na+ Channels by Antidepressant Drugs. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(24)37206-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.