Cited by 77Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologySmoking Behavior and Cessation

Acute effects of nicotine on prolactin release in the rat: agonist and antagonist effects of a single injection of nicotine

Hulihan-Giblin, B A, Lumpkin, M D, Kellar, K J·1990·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The effects of nicotine on prolactin release were studied in conscious, unrestrained rats in which an indwelling jugular cannula allowed multiple samplings of blood after i.v. administration of nicotine. Intravenous administration of nicotine bitartrate dihydrate increases plasma prolactin concentrations in a dose-dependent manner with an ED50 of approximately 100 micrograms/kg (200 nmol/kg) and this effect is blocked completely by pretreatment with mecamylamine, indicating that it is mediated by a nicotinic cholinergic receptor. Intracerebral ventricular injection of 1 microgram of nicotine also increases plasma prolactin levels, but i.v. injection of this same amount of nicotine has no effect, indicating that nicotine acts within the brain to release prolactin. A single i.v. injection of nicotine resulted in desensitization of the prolactin response to a subsequent injection of nicotine given 1 to 2 hr later, thus confirming a previous report by Sharp and Beyer (J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 238: 486-491, 1986). The prolactin response to nicotine was restored within 24 hr after a single injection. The acute desensitization after a single injection of nicotine appears to be specific to release of prolactin by nicotine because the prolactin response to morphine was unaffected 1 hr after injection of nicotine. A single injection of nicotine appears to desensitize the prolactin response to a subsequent injection of nicotine with an ED50 of approximately 20 micrograms/kg (40 nmol/kg), indicating that nicotine is even more potent in stimulating desensitization of nicotinic cholinergic receptors than in stimulating prolactin release. These results support the concept that nicotine acts as a time-averaged antagonist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)13322-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hulihan-Giblin, B. A., Lumpkin, M. D., & Kellar, K. J.
Affiliations
Georgetown University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1990-01
Volume
252
Issue
1
Pages
15-20
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1856037288
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine, prolactin secretion, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor desensitization, mecamylamine, morphine, plasma prolactin, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Injections, Intraventricular, Male, Mecamylamine, Morphine, Nicotine, Prolactin, Rats, Inbred Strains, Receptors, Nicotinic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review