Cited by 183Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyPrenatal Substance Exposure EffectsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Development of [3H]nicotine binding sites in brain regions of rats exposed to nicotine prenatally via maternal injections or infusions.

Slotkin, T A, Orband-Miller, L, Queen, K L·1987·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The fetal and postnatal development of binding sites for [3H]nicotine was examined in brain regions of normal rats and rats whose mothers received nicotine injections or infusions, starting before fetal implantation (gestational day 4) and continuing to gestational day 20. The normal ontogenetic pattern of binding indicated a small but detectable concentration of sites during late gestation, and a substantial increase after birth, primarily during the period in which the majority of cholinergic synapses is forming. The adult pattern of regional selectivity of binding capabilities, namely midbrain + brainstem greater than cerebral cortex much greater than cerebellum, was not present at birth, but rather developed over the ensuing 3 weeks postpartum. Fetal exposure to nicotine produced an elevation in binding detectable during the course of drug exposure (gestational day 18), a finding similar to nicotine's effects in mature brain. However, examination of the subsequent developmental pattern of [3H]nicotine binding indicated a generalized disruption of receptor acquisition, in that alterations persisted far beyond the period in which drug exposure was terminated. The greatest effect was seen in a region relatively poor in receptor sites (cerebellum), and a larger stimulation was obtained with injected vs. infused nicotine. Because the cerebellum is the primary target for disruption of cellular development by prenatal nicotine exposure, these results are consistent with a primar…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-3565(25)39058-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slotkin, T. A., Orband-Miller, L., & Queen, K. L.
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-07
Volume
242
Issue
1
Pages
232-237
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2262358589
Cited by
183
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
prenatal nicotine exposure, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor development, fetal brain development, postnatal development, cerebellum, teratogenicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Stem, Cell Membrane, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Gestational Age, Infusion Pumps, Injections, Subcutaneous, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Mesencephalon, Nicotine, Pregnancy, Receptors, Nicotinic, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review