Reciprocity and the emergence of reputation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The widespread tendency to judge actions between third parties, and the readiness for cooperation combined with altruistic punishment (strong reciprocity) has been neatly captured in an experiment involving three players.
“The widespread tendency to judge actions between third parties, and the readiness for cooperation combined with altruistic punishment (also known as strong reciprocity 69 ) has been neatly captured in an experiment involving three players 70,71 .”
From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners' dilemma
Kreps, D. M., Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., & Wilson, R. (1982) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(82)90029-1 · Cited by 2,494 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of indirect reciprocity
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04131 · Cited by 2,762 · see citing works
A tale of two defectors: the importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity
Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2003) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00154-1 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment
Seinen, I., & Schram, A. (2006) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.10.005 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
A unified framework of direct and indirect reciprocity
Schmid, L., Chatterjee, K., Hilbe, C., & Nowak, M. A. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01114-8 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0762 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31225 · Cited by 2,700 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pollock, G., & Dugatkin, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pollock, Gregory
- ORCID
- Dugatkin, Lee Alan
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-37
- ISSN
- 0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048943795
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 65.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- reputation, reciprocity, tit-for-tat, evolutionary stability, invasion resistance, clustering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review