Cited by 232Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsReading and Literacy Development

Repetition and depth of processing

Nelson, Thomas O.·1977·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80044-3

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, T. O.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Nelson, Thomas O.
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-04
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
151-171
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053634326
Cited by
231
References
87
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
levels of processing, repetition, memory enhancement, cued recall, recognition memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review