Cited by 129Memory and Neural MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Impaired fear conditioning in Alzheimer’s disease

Hamann, Stephan, Monarch, Elena S, Goldstein, Felicia C·2002·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

Classical conditioning of the fear response is a basic form of nondeclarative (nonconscious) memory that mediates both normal and pathological responses to aversive stimuli. Because fear conditioning critically depends on the amygdala, a medial temporal lobe structure that frequently undergoes significant pathological changes early in the course of Alzheimer's disease (AD), we hypothesized that fear conditioning would be impaired in patients with mild to moderate AD. We examined simple classical fear conditioning in a group of 10 patients with probable AD and 14 demographically matched, neurologically intact elderly controls. During conditioning, one stimulus (e.g. a green rectangle, the conditioned stimulus (CS+)), was paired with an aversive stimulus (a loud noise, the unconditioned stimulus (US)) using a partial reinforcement conditioning schedule. The opponent color (e.g. red rectangle), the CS-, was never paired with the US. The elderly controls acquired robust fear responses as demonstrated by their differential skin-conductance responses to the CS+ and CS-. In contrast, the AD group showed a marked impairment in conditioning, failing to exhibit significant conditioned fear responses. This failure to acquire conditioned responses could not be attributed to diminished responding by patients, relative to controls, to the aversive US. The results indicate that fear conditioning, an amygdala-dependent form of memory, is impaired in AD. These findings complement previous rep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00223-8

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Context-associated memory deficit is typical in AD patients and manifested as dysfunction of fear conditioning involving neural circuits of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex.

    “Context-associated memory: This deficit is typical in AD patients [128][129][130] and manifested as dysfunction of fear conditioning 82 involving neural circuits of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex 131,132 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamann, S., Monarch, E. S., & Goldstein, F. C.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Hamann, Stephan
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
1187-1195
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052839536
Cited by
129
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG010130, P30 AG10130)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, fear conditioning, classical conditioning, implicit memory, emotional memory, amygdala, skin conductance response, aversive stimuli, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Amygdala, Arousal, Association Learning, Color Perception, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Mental Recall

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review