Cited by 1,125Face Recognition and PerceptionMemory and Neural MechanismsEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The human amygdala in social judgment

Adolphs, Ralph, Tranel, Daniel, Damasio, Antonio R.·1998·Nature

Abstract

Studies in animals have implicated the amygdala in emotional and social behaviours, especially those related to fear and aggression. Although lesion and functional imaging studies in humans have demonstrated the amygdala's participation in recognizing emotional facial expressions, its role in human social behaviour has remained unclear. We report here our investigation into the hypothesis that the human amygdala is required for accurate social judgments of other individuals on the basis of their facial appearance. We asked three subjects with complete bilateral amygdala damage to judge faces of unfamiliar people with respect to two attributes important in real-life social encounters: approachability and trustworthiness. All three subjects judged unfamiliar individuals to be more approachable and more trustworthy than did control subjects. The impairment was most striking for faces to which normal subjects assign the most negative ratings: unapproachable and untrustworthy looking individuals. Additional investigations revealed that the impairment does not extend to judging verbal descriptions of people. The amygdala appears to be an important component of the neural systems that help retrieve socially relevant knowledge on the basis of facial appearance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/30982

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with amygdala damage show impairments in complex social judgments based on facial expression, such as trustworthiness.

    “and in complex social judgments based on facial expression (e.g.how trustworthy the person was) (Adolphs et al., 1998).”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Adolphs et al., 1998

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Adolphs, Ralph
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-06
Volume
393
Issue
6684
Pages
470-474
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1634162372
Cited by
1,125
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 64
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
amygdala, social judgment, facial appearance, approachability, trustworthiness, amygdala damage, social cognition, facial expression recognition, social evaluation, verbal description
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Brain Diseases, Cues, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Social Behavior, Visual Perception, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review